2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-007-9147-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The potential demand for a urban freight consolidation centre

Abstract: City logistics, Urban freight consolidation centre (UFCC), Stated preference, Transport demand analysis, Urban goods distribution,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
52
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, Allen et al (2012) note that different stakeholders should contribute to the financing of UCCs. Along the same lines, Marcucci and Danielis (2007) state that when considering costs and benefits, it is important to consider both private and social stakeholders. From the more general business model literature, a customer is someone to whom an organisation offers value; this can be likened to benefits UCCs can provide for different stakeholders (see e.g.…”
Section: Ucc Customersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, Allen et al (2012) note that different stakeholders should contribute to the financing of UCCs. Along the same lines, Marcucci and Danielis (2007) state that when considering costs and benefits, it is important to consider both private and social stakeholders. From the more general business model literature, a customer is someone to whom an organisation offers value; this can be likened to benefits UCCs can provide for different stakeholders (see e.g.…”
Section: Ucc Customersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a simulation study conducted in Italy (Marcucci and Danielis 2008), urban distribution centres were found to be capable of attracting a share of up to 50%…”
Section: Urban Distribution Centresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can also assist in achieving sustainability goals by decreasing the number of vehicles entering the city. Despite the theoretical advantages of UCCs, most initiatives were terminated within a few years (Quak 2008) because of limited usage, the cost of the additional transhipment, drop back of the initial governmental subsidies, wrong location choice, wrong type of vehicle and/ or bad organisation of the UCC (Browne et al 2005;Marcucci, Danielis 2008;Van Duin et al 2010;Wolpert, Reuter 2012;Olsson, Woxenius 2014). To understand the reason behind low volumes, it is important to understand this variability in perspectives towards UCCs among stakeholders in the urban freight domain.…”
Section: Uccs In the Netherlandsmentioning
confidence: 99%