2018
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Potential Clinical Utility of Circulating Tumor DNA in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: From Early Detection to Therapy

Abstract: Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is a lethal cancer requiring improved screening strategies and treatment options due to poor detection methods, aggressive progression, and therapeutic resistance. Emerging circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) technologies may offer a unique non-invasive strategy to better characterize the highly heterogeneous cancer and more clearly establish the genetic modulations leading to disease progression. The presented review describes the potential advantages of ctDNA methodologies as compar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last decades, a growing body of evidence has defined the potential clinical value of ctDNA because it may recapitulate the entire tumor molecular profile. Therefore, it could be used for diagnostic, prognostic, monitoring, and therapeutic purposes [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decades, a growing body of evidence has defined the potential clinical value of ctDNA because it may recapitulate the entire tumor molecular profile. Therefore, it could be used for diagnostic, prognostic, monitoring, and therapeutic purposes [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated, the tumor genome changed with disease progression. To achieve the best clinical response, one hypothesis would be to constantly change treatment strategy in response to the changing molecular profile of tumor cells ( Xu et al 2017 ; Kosovec et al 2018 ; Xu et al 2019 ; Zhang et al 2019 ). However, taking repeated tissue biopsies is often not feasible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The median duration of treatment with sintilimab, paclitaxel, and irinotecan was 11.9 (range 3-112), 11.9 (range 3-42) and 7.0 (3-30) wk, respectively; the median cycle was 4 (range 1-36), 4 (range 1-14), and 3 (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14), respectively. The median relative dose intensity was 100.0 % (range 66.…”
Section: Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%