1981
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1981.tb01264.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Potassium Iodide Method for Determining Protection Factors in Open‐fronted Microbiological Safety Cabinets

Abstract: A method for determining operator protection factors in Class I and Class II microbiological safety cabinets and for evaluating product protection factors in Class II cabinets, is described. The technique employs an aerosol of potassium iodide droplets produced by a spinning disc generator together with special centripetal air samplers detecting any aerosol escape. The method meets the requirements of British Standard (BS) 5726 and is an alternative to the microbiological technique. The method has been used to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The concept of containment testing became generally accepted. In order to do this safely, quickly and accurately, a system known as potassium iodide (KI) Discus was developed (Clark & Goff 1981), the use of which is now incorporated into the requirements of national and international standards.…”
Section: Use Of Tracers To Mimic the Movement Of Pathogens In Healthcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of containment testing became generally accepted. In order to do this safely, quickly and accurately, a system known as potassium iodide (KI) Discus was developed (Clark & Goff 1981), the use of which is now incorporated into the requirements of national and international standards.…”
Section: Use Of Tracers To Mimic the Movement Of Pathogens In Healthcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). The average protection factor (PF) was then evaluated from the equation PF = 62 x 105/n where n is the number in the 'count' column (Clark & Goff 1981).…”
Section: Cabinet Commissioning Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Drafts, supplyair louvers, and other laminar flow equipment placed near the BSC can interfere with the containment properties of the inflow air barrier, resulting in contamination of the work environment. 63 More information on the design and use of Class II BSCs is available from the NSF International (NSF)/American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standard 49-04. 62 Recommendations for use of Class II BSCs are listed in Appendix A.…”
Section: Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%