2021
DOI: 10.1186/s42466-021-00137-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The PostStroke-Manager – combining mobile, digital and sensor-based technology with personal assistance: protocol of the feasibility study

Abstract: Introduction Post stroke management has moved into the focus as it represents the only way to secure acute treatment effects in the long term. Due to individual courses, post stroke management appears rather challenging and is hindered by existing barriers between treatment sectors. As a novel concept, the PostStroke-Manager combines digital and sensor-based technology with personal assistance to enable intersectoral cooperation, best possible reduction of stroke-related disability, optimal sec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although previsit digital tools have been designed for people with various conditions [ 2 , 16 , 17 , 25 ], tools related to organized follow-up after stroke are scarce [ 11 ]. Furthermore, when digital elements are used, they are commonly part of a comprehensive and complex approach to poststroke follow-up [ 26 , 27 ] and lack a thorough description of the development process including user experiences [ 26 ]. Additionally, tools commonly request patient-reported data [ 16 , 17 ] without a combined solution in which patients in turn receive tailored health information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although previsit digital tools have been designed for people with various conditions [ 2 , 16 , 17 , 25 ], tools related to organized follow-up after stroke are scarce [ 11 ]. Furthermore, when digital elements are used, they are commonly part of a comprehensive and complex approach to poststroke follow-up [ 26 , 27 ] and lack a thorough description of the development process including user experiences [ 26 ]. Additionally, tools commonly request patient-reported data [ 16 , 17 ] without a combined solution in which patients in turn receive tailored health information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%