2008
DOI: 10.1214/ejp.v13-560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Posterior metric and the Goodness of Gibbsianness for transforms of Gibbs measures

Abstract: We present a general method to derive continuity estimates for conditional probabilities of general (possibly continuous) spin models subjected to local transformations. Such systems arise in the study of a stochastic time-evolution of Gibbs measures or as noisy observations.We exhibit the minimal necessary structure for such double-layer systems. Assuming no a priori metric on the local state spaces, we define the posterior metric on the local image space. We show that it allows in a natural way to divide the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
73
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(38 reference statements)
5
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar short-time results for more general compact spins can be found in Ref. 14 This paper is a continuation of Ref. 9.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Similar short-time results for more general compact spins can be found in Ref. 14 This paper is a continuation of Ref. 9.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This is in nice analogy to the corresponding lattice results obtained in the paper in Ref. 24 using techniques based on the Dobrushin uniqueness. More can be said, however, about the transformed system and can be put in perspective with the corresponding lattice results.…”
supporting
confidence: 87%
“…As discussed in Ref. 24 we begin with a first-layer mean-field system, described by some given mean-field interaction ⌽ and the a priori measure ␣ with S as its single-site space. This system is coupled to a second system ͑second-layer system with SЈ as its single-site spin space͒ via K. In other words, we begin with two independent systems, namely, the first-layer system, described by ⌽ and ␣, and the second-layer system which is independent and identically distributed with distribution ␣Ј.…”
Section: Two-layer System and Gibbsianness Of Transformed Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This specific choice is for the sake of explicit analytic computability but many results are true for a general class of rate functions that have a similar graph with two zeros located at −a, a and a maximum at zero. More formally, we require that the sequence of initial probability measures {μ n , n ∈ N} satisfies the large deviation principle with rate function i given by (8). Such rate functions arise naturally in the context of mean-field models with continuous spins and spinHamiltonian depending on the magnetization.…”
Section: Brownian Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%