2019
DOI: 10.1080/1523908x.2019.1680276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The post-political nature of marine spatial planning and modalities for its re-politicisation

Abstract: Marine spatial planning (MSP) has become the most adopted approach for sustainable marine governance. While MSP has transformative capacity, evaluations of its implementation illustrate large gaps between how it is conceptualised and how it is practiced. We argue that these gaps arise from MSP being implemented through post-political processes. Although MSP has been explored through post-political lenses, these evaluations are incomplete and do not provide sufficient detail about the complex nature of the post… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others nonetheless deal with different social sustainability issues, and there are calls for a more integrated analysis of social sustainability [9,20,21]. More precisely, in analyzing social sustainability (albeit, often implicitly), some authors view MSP as a form of "ocean grabbing" [22,23]; as exhibiting many symptoms of the post-political condition [5,6,9,24]. Others emphasize the exclusion of coastal communities' socio-cultural values and benefits [6,11,25], a failure to consider the rights, needs, knowledge, and livelihoods of small-scale fishers (SSFs) and the coastal communities that they are embedded in [6,10,12,26,27], and a narrow interpretation of Blue Economy geared to facilitating economic growth (with a lack of attention paid to social inequality implications) [12,27,28].…”
Section: Social Sustainability In the Msp Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others nonetheless deal with different social sustainability issues, and there are calls for a more integrated analysis of social sustainability [9,20,21]. More precisely, in analyzing social sustainability (albeit, often implicitly), some authors view MSP as a form of "ocean grabbing" [22,23]; as exhibiting many symptoms of the post-political condition [5,6,9,24]. Others emphasize the exclusion of coastal communities' socio-cultural values and benefits [6,11,25], a failure to consider the rights, needs, knowledge, and livelihoods of small-scale fishers (SSFs) and the coastal communities that they are embedded in [6,10,12,26,27], and a narrow interpretation of Blue Economy geared to facilitating economic growth (with a lack of attention paid to social inequality implications) [12,27,28].…”
Section: Social Sustainability In the Msp Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent years have seen an increase in work that considers unequal power relations, exclusions and omissions in ocean governance processes and outcomes, and challenges in regimes of participation and decision-making (see [13][14][15][16][17][18] for just a few examples). Moreover, research has considered some of the underlying processes that shape the form and outcome of ocean governance techniques (see, for example, Clarke and Flannery [19] on the 'gaps' between how MSP is imagined and practiced as post-political; Gray's work [6] on how high seas conservation practices borrow state-based territorial logics; or recent interventions by Ntona and Schröder [20] on how MSP neglects royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rstb Phil. Trans.…”
Section: Ocean Governance In a Vacuum? Setting The Scenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Above n. 92. marine spatial planning and the modalities for its re-politicisation' by Clarke and Flannery in which they argue 'that the focus on reducing conflict in marine governance removes debate about the purpose of MSP' and that 'differences between actors must be brought into a public forum in which they can be explored and articulated'. 104 A further explanation is that the particular contribution that policy makes to marine decisions is not recorded explicitly, as there appears to be no explicit expectation in decision letters or committee reports for decision-makers, to assess marine policy conformity, although this is explicit in the 2009 Act. 105 This may be a product of culture (see below) or a product of the processing of applications.…”
Section: Causal Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%