The Post‐Perovskite Transition in Fe‐ and Al‐Bearing Bridgmanite: Effects on Seismic Observables

Abstract

The primary phase of the Earth’s lower mantle, (Al, Fe)‐bearing bridgmanite, transitions to the post‐perovskite (PPv) phase at Earth’s deep mantle conditions. Despite extensive experimental and ab initio investigations, there are still important aspects of this transformation that need clarification. Here, we address this transition in (Al3+, Fe3+)‐, (Al3+)‐, (Fe2+)‐, and (Fe3+)‐bearing bridgmanite using ab initio calculations and validate our results against experiments on similar compositions. Consistent with experiments, our results show that the onset transition pressure and the width of the two‐phase region depend distinctly on the chemical composition: (a) Fe3+‐, Al3+‐, or (Al3+, Fe3+)‐alloying increases the transition pressure, while Fe2+‐alloying has the opposite effect; (b) in the absence of coexisting phases, the pressure‐depth range of the Pv‐PPv transition is likely too broad to cause a sharp D” discontinuity (<30 km); (c) the average Clapeyron slope of the two‐phase regions are consistent with previous measurements, calculations in MgSiO3, and inferences from seismic data. In addition, (d) we observe a softening of the bulk modulus in the two‐phase region. The consistency between our results and experiments gives us the confidence to proceed and examine this transition in aggregates with different compositions computationally, which will be fundamental for resolving the most likely chemical composition of the D" region by analyses of tomographic images.

Fe2+ partitioning in Al-free pyrolite: consequences for seismic velocities and heterogeneities

“…The Gibbs free energy of Bm and Fp have been calculated more than once by our group using the QHA Hsu et al, 2011Hsu et al, , 2012Shukla et al, 2015Shukla et al, , 2016Wentzcovitch et al, 2023). The details of the Gibbs free energy calculations of Bm and Fp are reported in Text ST1.2.…”

Full-waveform tomography reveals iron spin crossover in Earth’s lower mantle

“…a) the MgO-FeO solid solution modeling is treated as a quasi-ideal solid-solution 51,52 with end-members MgO and Mg(1-x)FexO (xFe = 0.1875) in the high-spin (HS) of low-spin (LS) state. This level of modeling is equivalent to treating the solid solution as a Henryan solution, with an activity coefficient different from 1 but constant for small x; b) the Mg(1-x)Fex HS O and Mg(1-x)Fex LS O solution modeling with fixed x and LS fraction 𝑛 = 9 :; 9 <; =9 :;…”