The Post-Pandemic World: between Constitutionalized and Authoritarian Orders – China’s Narrative-Power Play in the Pandemic Era

Abstract

The paper aims to address the development of China’s narrative power during the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on world order. It argues that in the post-pandemic world, the emergence of the authoritarian sub-order would be prompted by China’s more proactive narrative power, given that the climate of opinion is ambiguous when faced with the uncertainty of the pandemic. (This does not imply the end of the existing liberal order; instead, it features the coexistence of both orders.) To understand how China’s narrative power has encouraged the emergence of the authoritarian sub-order to coexist in parallel with the dominant constitutional order, the article first reviews the existing literature concerning the changing world order. In this section, it also briefly defines and differentiates between the constitutional and authoritarian orders, what defines world order, and what distinguishes authoritarian from constitutional liberal order. Second it looks at the theoretical grounding. The nature, role and power of narratives are explored. Ideas about strategic narratives and the economics of attention are discussed. This theoretical background paves the way to examine China’s narrative power during a pandemic. Lastly, it switches to the Chinese perspective to address its support for the plurality of orders and its awareness of the strength of narrative in influencing dominant ideas. It looks at how China’s narrative power has been exercised from three perspectives (formation, projection and reception). Here, it mainly tackles how China has used its narrative power to spin the pandemic to its advantage in the reorganization of world order: improving its international image and advocating the authoritarian order as an alternative. China has been building its narrative along with its changing strategic diplomacy – from restrained and low-profile to proactive and assertive. In the conclusion, some reflections on China’s narrative power and the implications for world order are considered.

The Struggle for Certainty: Ontological Security, the Rise of Nationalism, and Australia-China Tensions after COVID-19

“…However, Australia's bid has been countered by China's "Wolf Warrior" diplomacy, which refers to the high-profile nationalist diplomacy conducted by Chinese diplomats through mass media and driven by a more proactive narrative strategy [13]. As Australia's pursuit of ontological security has greatly damaged China's prestige in international society, this offensive initiative has caused China to quickly form a counterattack with a nationalistic tone.…”

COVID-19 and China’s Changing Soft Power in Italy

“…Verma views China’s COVID-19 aid as a victory declaration to show Xi’s leadership abilities and superiority of China’s economic and political system vis-à-vis that of democratic systems. Furthermore, China’s narrative power during the pandemic not only helped to “reshape its international image and to strengthen its international legitimacy and status” (Chang 2021 : 59).…”

Sota virusta vastaan

“…esim. Arcuri 2020; De Leon 2020;Taguieff 2020;Chang 2020;Manghi 2020). Tämän keskustelun sisällä monet ovat myös esittäneet vastakkaisen ajatuksen siitä, että pandemia heikentää tai on jo heikentänyt kansallisvaltion suvereenia positiota poliittisessa elämässä (ks.…”