2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gr.2022.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The post-Caledonian thermo-tectonic evolution of Fennoscandia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While fission tracks in apatite alone are much used for assessing the denudation and thermal history in crystalline basement areas (e.g. Gallagher, 1995; Green et al, 2022; Japsen et al, 2005; McGregor et al, 2013; Moore et al, 1986; Nielsen et al, 2009; Pedersen et al, 2012), they have less frequently been used in sedimentary boreholes together with vitrinite reflectance and present‐day temperature. He and Lerche (1989) may have been first to propose the joint inversion of apatite fission tracks (AFT) and vitrinite reflectance to reconstruct paleo temperatures and heat flow.…”
Section: Thermal Indicators Constrain the Thermal Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While fission tracks in apatite alone are much used for assessing the denudation and thermal history in crystalline basement areas (e.g. Gallagher, 1995; Green et al, 2022; Japsen et al, 2005; McGregor et al, 2013; Moore et al, 1986; Nielsen et al, 2009; Pedersen et al, 2012), they have less frequently been used in sedimentary boreholes together with vitrinite reflectance and present‐day temperature. He and Lerche (1989) may have been first to propose the joint inversion of apatite fission tracks (AFT) and vitrinite reflectance to reconstruct paleo temperatures and heat flow.…”
Section: Thermal Indicators Constrain the Thermal Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The topographic development is set to start from the initial constraint. To test for repeated episodes of exhumation, peneplanation and reburial, we added constraint boxes according to the model suggested for the Jotunheimen transect by Green et al. (2022, their Figure 8a). Based on the estimated paleotemperatures for the high elevation samples of the transect and the suggested peneplains for the region, the following events were interpreted (Figure 6c): development of a sub‐Permian Peneplain (300‐280 Ma), burial to 130‐120°C in the Middle Triassic (250‐240 Ma), followed by cooling/exhumation and the formation of a Late Triassic peneplain (235‐220 Ma), renewed burial to ∼90‐80°C in the Middle Jurassic (175‐160 Ma), and renewed cooling/exhumation leading to a Late Jurassic peneplain (165‐150 Ma), burial to ∼65‐60°C in the mid‐Cretaceous (105‐90 Ma), the development of a Late Cretaceous peneplain (95‐85 Ma), burial to ∼40‐35°C in the Early Miocene (24‐20 Ma) with subsequent start of cooling/exhumation to surface conditions.…”
Section: Thermal History Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the estimated paleotemperatures for the high elevation samples of the transect and the suggested peneplains for the region, the following events were interpreted (Figure 6c): development of a sub-Permian Peneplain (300-280 Ma), burial to 130-120°C in the Middle Triassic (250-240 Ma), followed by cooling/exhumation and the formation of a Late Triassic peneplain (235-220 Ma), renewed burial to ∼90-80°C in the Middle Jurassic (175-160 Ma), and renewed cooling/exhumation leading to a Late Jurassic peneplain (165-150 Ma), burial to ∼65-60°C in the mid-Cretaceous (105-90 Ma), the development of a Late Cretaceous peneplain (95-85 Ma), burial to ∼40-35°C in the Early Miocene (24-20 Ma) with subsequent start of cooling/exhumation to surface conditions. As suggested by Green et al (2022), it is not assured that all cooling episodes led to cooling to surface temperatures. Therefore, we allowed the "peneplain" constraint-boxes to stretch from the surface to 2 km depth.…”
Section: Modeling Approach: Transferring Geological Evolution Into Th...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Apatite He ages further suggest that southeastern Sweden experienced minimal erosion post‐100 Ma (Söderlund et al., 2005). The Mesozoic to recent thermal history for southern Sweden is disputed, with some authors arguing for a small amount (∼15°C) of Late Cretaceous reheating (Green & Duddy, 2006) or even repeated (and hotter) episodic reheating throughout the Mesozoic and Cenozoic (Green et al., 2022).…”
Section: Geological Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%