2008
DOI: 10.1002/job.505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The positive group affect spiral: a dynamic model of the emergence of positive affective similarity in work groups

Abstract: SummaryThis conceptual paper seeks to clarify the process of the emergence of positive collective affect. Specifically, it develops a dynamic model of the emergence of positive affective similarity in work groups. It is suggested that positive group affective similarity and within-group relationship quality are reciprocally interrelated in the form of a self-reinforcing spiral, which is driven by mechanisms of affective sharing and affective similarity-attraction between group members. We label this spiraling … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
175
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
(264 reference statements)
2
175
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Such stability may be shaped by bottom-up processes such that team members will have similar affective experiences due to emotion contagion or behavioral entrainment in social interactions (Barsade & Gibson, 1998;Bartel & Saavedra, 2000;Totterdell, Kellett, Teuchmann, & Briner, 1998). Alternatively, such stability may be shaped by top-down processes such that team members will have similar affective experiences due to the attraction-selection-attrition process (i.e., retain members who have Transformational Leadership and Team Proactivity 6 similar affective reactions) or socialization (i.e., new members assimilate their affective reactions to the group norm) (Collins, Lawrence, Troth, & Jordan, 2013), which results in the emergence of positive affective similarity in work groups in a positive spiral (Walter & Bruch, 2008).…”
Section: Group Affective Tonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such stability may be shaped by bottom-up processes such that team members will have similar affective experiences due to emotion contagion or behavioral entrainment in social interactions (Barsade & Gibson, 1998;Bartel & Saavedra, 2000;Totterdell, Kellett, Teuchmann, & Briner, 1998). Alternatively, such stability may be shaped by top-down processes such that team members will have similar affective experiences due to the attraction-selection-attrition process (i.e., retain members who have Transformational Leadership and Team Proactivity 6 similar affective reactions) or socialization (i.e., new members assimilate their affective reactions to the group norm) (Collins, Lawrence, Troth, & Jordan, 2013), which results in the emergence of positive affective similarity in work groups in a positive spiral (Walter & Bruch, 2008).…”
Section: Group Affective Tonementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, processes subsumed under the topics of shared mental models (Mohammed and Dumville, 2001) In addition to these largely cognitive processes, affective and behavioral processes exist that might be responsible for the transmission of individual training effects on group characteristics (Barsade, 2002;Walter and Bruch, 2008). Affective or behavioral contagion occurs through subconscious and conscious influence of emotion states and behavioral attitudes of another person or group (Barsade, 2002).…”
Section: How An Individual-level Employee Empowerment Training Programentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, empirical evidence indicates that social interaction in working groups or teams produces shared phenomena (Hinsz, Tindale, & Vollrath, 1997;Walter & Bruch, 2008). Nicholson and Johns (1985) argue for the existence of a shared psychological contract when members of a team experience a common set of psychological contracts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%