The Portuguese version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM‐5 in a community and a clinical sample

Pires, Rute; Ferreira, Ana Sousa; Gonçalves, Bruno; Henriques-Calado, Joana; Paulino, Marco

doi:10.1002/pmh.1437

Cited by 16 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…First, there was the issue of irresponsibility facet loading primarily on Psychoticism and only secondarily on Disinhibition, its respective domain. Although there was a relatively small difference between loadings found in this study (λ = 0.37 vs. λ = 0.36), it can be seen as further evidence of proneness of the irresponsibility factor to cross-loadings, previously demonstrated in the extracted PID5BF+M by other studies using the original 220-item version of PID-5 [e.g., (31,32)]. It should be noted that these studies mostly employed samples from the general population or mixed samples with a predominance of respondents from the general population (11).…”

Section: Factor Structure and The Model Fitsupporting

confidence: 61%

Psychometric Properties of the Independent 36-Item PID5BF+M for ICD-11 in the Czech-Speaking Community Sample

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Empirical soundness and international robustness of the PID5BF+M, a shortened version of the PID-5 developed for simultaneous evaluation of maladaptive personality traits in the DSM-5 AMPD and ICD-11 models for personality disorders, was recently confirmed in 16 samples from different countries. Because the modified PID5BF+ scale (36 items) was extracted from the complete 220-item PID-5, an independent evaluation of psychometric properties of a stand-alone PID5BF+M is still missing.Objectives: The present study evaluated the validity and reliability of the 36-item PID5BF+M in comparison with the extracted version from the original PID-5. It also assessed associations between the Borderline Pattern qualifier and trait domain qualifiers.Methods: Two non-clinical samples meeting the inclusion criteria were employed in the study. Sample 1 (n = 614) completed the 220-item PID-5; Sample 2 (n = 1,040) completed the independent 36-item PID5BF+M. Participants were from all 14 regions of the Czech Republic. The Borderline Pattern qualifier was evaluated using a shortened IPDEQ screener.Results: The proposed latent structure of the independent PID5BF+M was confirmed, with an exception of the Disinhibition domain. The results confirmed good internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the measure, as well as some support for the measurement invariance of the independent PID5BF+M in comparison with the extracted version from the original PID-5. Significant associations between the Negative affectivity, Disinhibition, and Psychoticism qualifiers and the IPDEQ items for the emotionally unstable personality disorder of both impulsive and borderline types confirmed good predictive validity of the PID5BF+M in pursuing borderline psychopathology within the ICD-11 model.Conclusions: The independent PID5BF+M was found to be a valid and reliable tool for evaluation of the ICD-11 trait model. However, the Disinhibition domain deserves further investigation in clinical samples as well as in international community samples.

show abstract

Section: Factor Structure and The Model Fitsupporting

confidence: 61%

Psychometric Properties of the Independent 36-Item PID5BF+M for ICD-11 in the Czech-Speaking Community Sample

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Accordingly, in both the Czech sample [31], the US mixed sample [27], and the US student sample [28], distractibility cross-loaded on negative affectivity and psychoticism. Likewise, in the French community sample [34], the Swiss community sample [34], the Portuguese community sample [25], and the Spanish mixed sample [26], irresponsibility primarily loaded negatively on anankastia rather than disinhibition. Moreover, in the Brazilian mixed sample [30] impulsivity cross-loaded on negative affectivity, whereas in the Swiss sample impulsivity cross-loaded on antagonism.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the present international collaborative study we included a total of 16 samples from different countries, regions, and populations [17, 19, 25-37]. In order to ensure heterogeneity and evade range restriction, we deliberatively incorporated diverse samples including clinical, community, student, and mixed samples.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

International Assessment of DSM-5 and ICD-11 Personality Disorder Traits: Toward a Common Nosology in DSM-5.1

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: The DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) and the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders (PD) are largely commensurate and, when combined, they delineate 6 trait domains: negative affectivity, detachment, antagonism/dissociality, disinhibition, anankastia, and psychoticism. Objective: The present study evaluated the international validity of a brief 36-item patientreport measure that portrays all 6 domains simultaneously including 18 primary subfacets. Methods: We developed and employed a modified version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5-Brief Form Plus (PID5BF+). A total of 16,327 individuals were included, 2,347 of whom were patients. The expected 6-factor structure of facets was initially investigated in samples from Denmark (n = 584), Germany (n = 1,271), and the USA (n = 605) and subsequently replicated in both patient-and community samples from Italy,

show abstract

“…In fact, although the domain Psychoticism primarily emerged from features of Negative affectivity, Disinhibition, and Detachment [ 53 , 54 ], it has been pointed as heterogeneous, and some studies found deviant facet loading in this domain [ 29 , 55 ]. Others even reported its absence from their factor structure in a clinical sample [ 56 ]. Furthermore, studies that tried to harmonize the DSM-5 trait model with the ICD-11 personality model stated that in order to facilitate the communication between clinicians, the domain Psychoticism should not be conceptualized in terms of personality pathology, as it is considered under the spectrum of schizophrenia disorder by the World Health Organization [ 57 , 58 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Arabic Version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) in a Community Sample of United Arab Emirates Nationals

Coelho¹,

Pires²,

Ferreira³

et al. 2020

CPEMH

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Section III of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) proposes a model for conceptualizing personality disorders in which they are characterized by impairments in personality functioning and maladaptive personality traits. The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) is a self-report measure that assesses the presence and severity of these maladaptive personality traits. Objective: The current study examined the reliability and validity of the Arabic version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) to measure maladaptive personality traits in the Emirati population of the United Arab Emirates. Methods: The Arabic version of the PID-5 was administered to a community sample of 1,090 United Arab Emirates nationals (89.5% female and 10.5% male, mean age = 22.44 years old). The descriptive measures, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent validity with NEO – Five Factor Inventory, as well as PID-5’s factor structure, were all addressed. Results: The PID-5facets and domains mean scores were higher in the Emirati sample compared to the original US sample. Internal consistency of the PID-5 scales was acceptable to high and test-retest coefficients ranged from 0.84 (facets) to 0.87 (domains). As expected, the five domains of the Arabic version of the PID-5 correlated significantly with all Five-Factor Model domains of personality. Additionally, the Arabic version of the PID-5 confirmed a five-factor structure that resembles the PID-5 domains. Conclusion: The findings of this study provided initial support for the use of the Arabic version of the PID-5 to assess maladaptive personality traits in the Emirati population of the United Arab Emirates.

show abstract

The Portuguese version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM‐5 in a community and a clinical sample

Abstract: Portuguese version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 in a community and a clinical sample.

Cited by 16 publications

References 37 publications

Psychometric Properties of the Independent 36-Item PID5BF+M for ICD-11 in the Czech-Speaking Community Sample

Psychometric Properties of the Independent 36-Item PID5BF+M for ICD-11 in the Czech-Speaking Community Sample

International Assessment of DSM-5 and ICD-11 Personality Disorder Traits: Toward a Common Nosology in DSM-5.1

Arabic Version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) in a Community Sample of United Arab Emirates Nationals

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About