1983
DOI: 10.2307/2259598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Population Biology of Plants with Clonal Growth: II. The Nutrient Strategy and Modular Physiology of Carex Arenaria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
2
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
43
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The growth of stolons of A. stolonifera deprived of nutrients was very restricted and their ramets responded to nutrient shortage by increasing the proportional allocation of biomass to the roots. The latter response is a well-recorded characteristic of plants grown in conditions of low nutrient status (Troughton, 1967;Noble & Marshall, 1983;Fitter & Hay, 1987) and suggests the lack of significant nutrient transfer from parts of the clone supplied with nutrients to alleviate the shortage of nutrients in parts given only water. In stolons deprived of nutrients it was also evident that the growth of the unrooted, extending portion of the stolon was reduced to a far lesser degree than that of established ramets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The growth of stolons of A. stolonifera deprived of nutrients was very restricted and their ramets responded to nutrient shortage by increasing the proportional allocation of biomass to the roots. The latter response is a well-recorded characteristic of plants grown in conditions of low nutrient status (Troughton, 1967;Noble & Marshall, 1983;Fitter & Hay, 1987) and suggests the lack of significant nutrient transfer from parts of the clone supplied with nutrients to alleviate the shortage of nutrients in parts given only water. In stolons deprived of nutrients it was also evident that the growth of the unrooted, extending portion of the stolon was reduced to a far lesser degree than that of established ramets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Similarly, transpiration by poorly rooted developing ramets and by leaves on the unrooted extending section of the main stolon will establish a gradient in water potential along the stolon that will result in the flow of water and minerals, predominantly from the nearest wellestablished rooted ramet, to sustain the growth and development of the apical region of the stolon (Headley et al, 19886;Marshall, 1990). Thus there is no real discrepancy between the results of Experiments 2 and 3 where well-established ramets of A. stolonifera showed quite independent nutrient economies and longer-term experiments where the ramets of a stolon or rhizome growing from resourcerich to resource-poor conditions are able to support both the growth of young developing ramets and the extending apical axis (Noble & Marshall, 1983;Slade & Hutchmgs, 1987a;Evans, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…With its larger structure, C. arenaria can probably comb out more atmospheric N via its leaves as Ammophila arenaria does (Heil and others 1988). The N-content and N/P-ratio of Carex increase with rising N-deposition mainly at older successional stages, but no correlation was apparent between different soil N-forms and Carex tissue N. At older successional stages, atmospheric N may therefore contribute more to the nutrition of Carex than soil-derived N. With its extensive rhizome network, C. arenaria can exploit and transport temporally and spatially widespread resources nearly all year round (Noble and Marshall 1983;D'Hertenfeld and Falkengren-Grerup 2002;D'Hertenfeld and Jonsdottir 1999) and thereby efficiently use the surplus nitrogen supply. C. arenaria finally wins the competition under higher N-loads.…”
Section: Which Processes Change During Grass Encroachment?mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In many clonal species including Dupontia fischeri (Allessio & Tieszen, 1975), Carex arenaria (Noble, 1976;Tietema, 1980;Noble & Marshall, 1983), Viola blanda (Newell, 1982), Solidago canadensis (Hartnett & Bazzaz, 1983), Uncinia meridensis (Callaghan, 1984) and G. hederacea (Slade & Hutchings, 1987b), developing ramets have been shown to receive essential resources from earlier established ramets along the same stolon. During early development, young ramets are almost completely dependent on established ramets for support.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the time that stolon or rhizome connections between ramets remain intact in clonal plants, developing ramets are potentially able to receive essential resources from established ramets (Ginzo & Lovell, 1973a, b;Allessio & Tieszen, 1975;Noble, 1976;Newell, 1982;Noble & Marshall, 1983;Callaghan, 1984), thereby improving their chances of successful establishment (Sarukhan & Harper, 1973). The benefits and costs to individual ramets and to the clone as a whole of establishing and maintaining this type of physiological integration, rather than independence between ramets, are important considerations in determining whether integration will be a characteristic favoured by natural selection and the length of time for which ramets will remain integrated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%