Future Interaction Design II 2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84800-385-9_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Polysemy of Human–Computer Interaction

Abstract: This chapter provides exemplars of the influence of digital artifacts upon cultural experiences. We argue that the associations between people and artifacts, and specifically digital artifacts, is an increasingly dense, interwoven, and pivotal aspect of everyday cultural experience. Artifacts themselves resist any stability of meaning by being continuously disassembled and reassembled into newly meaningful assemblages. Digital artifacts extend this complexity by accelerating and extending cultural relationship… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As mentioned above, weak and strong scripts evince variety in the way they are integrated and performed. Scripts are polysemous ( Greenhill and Fletcher, 2009 ). One reason for this polysemy is that several actions that lead to the same result .…”
Section: Script Theory: Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, weak and strong scripts evince variety in the way they are integrated and performed. Scripts are polysemous ( Greenhill and Fletcher, 2009 ). One reason for this polysemy is that several actions that lead to the same result .…”
Section: Script Theory: Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, weak and strong scripts evince variety in the way they are integrated and performed. Scripts are polysemous (Greenhill & Fletcher, 2009). One reason for this polysemy is that several actions that lead to the same result.…”
Section: Script Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In academia, the spime concept has mostly been discussed in a purely theoretical manner and only contextualised within technological fields like ubiquitous computing, human-computer interaction, interaction design and the IoT (Thomas, 2006;Greenhill and Fletcher, 2009;Saffer, 2010). One academic project that does examine some of the sustainable implications of Sterling's concept is Bonanni et al's "Spime Builder" (2009).…”
Section: Spimes Are Not Thingsmentioning
confidence: 99%