2006
DOI: 10.1080/02757200600914037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Politics of Victimhood

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As indicated by Jeffrey and Candea (2006), a discourse of victimhood appeals to something ''nonagentive'' such as poverty and ''poses itself as the neutral or indisputable starting point from which discussion, debates, and action . .…”
Section: The Usefulness Of An Fda Approach In Relation To This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated by Jeffrey and Candea (2006), a discourse of victimhood appeals to something ''nonagentive'' such as poverty and ''poses itself as the neutral or indisputable starting point from which discussion, debates, and action . .…”
Section: The Usefulness Of An Fda Approach In Relation To This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emphasis on the enemy's invisibility and evilness enables proponents of the chemtrail theory to recognize their own powerlessness as an index of innocence and victimhood (cf. Jeffery and Candea :288–291; Stewart and Harding :294) and to transform their fear into proof of knowledge about the enemy's secret tricks and weapons (Humphrey ). The activist mentioned above told me that as more people join the struggle, aerial spraying intensifies “because those behind it realize that we know, and they want to wipe us out.” She also told me that prominent international fellow activists have suffered strange accidents which she thought were designed by the “bosses” of spraying or by their accomplices.…”
Section: Where Are the Good Guys?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, to even acknowledge the possibility of artifice in minority groups’ self‐representations can dangerously destabilize their ability to make political claims (Shryock , 286). There is a similar problem in writing anthropologically about groups that make particular political claims to victimhood, on which point Laura Jeffrey and Matei Candea have noted that there is “no comfortable mode in which to do” this; it necessarily comes from a place of “discomfort” (Jeffery and Candea , 290).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%