2019
DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2019.1616450
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The politics of un-belonging: lessons from Canada’s experiment with citizenship revocation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tujuan pendidikan kewarganegaraan adalah untuk membangun warga negara yang baik. Untuk alasan ini, pembentukan karakter tidak merupakan topik dasar di sekolah dasar (Džankić, 2021;Kowal, 2019;Widaningrum, 2023aWidaningrum, , 2023bWinter, 2019). Akibatnya, siswa tumbuh menjadi karakter yang sudah ada dalam diri siswa.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Tujuan pendidikan kewarganegaraan adalah untuk membangun warga negara yang baik. Untuk alasan ini, pembentukan karakter tidak merupakan topik dasar di sekolah dasar (Džankić, 2021;Kowal, 2019;Widaningrum, 2023aWidaningrum, , 2023bWinter, 2019). Akibatnya, siswa tumbuh menjadi karakter yang sudah ada dalam diri siswa.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Please also note that multiculturalism is not promoted in Quebec which instead advocates for "interculturalism" (Winter, 2015). on veiled citizenship uptake and citizenship revocation (Winter and Previsic, 2019), they so far failed to replace the citizenship study guide introduced by the Conservatives in 2009, which continues to advise immigrants against bringing "barbaric cultural practices" 12 from their home countries (Harris, 2019). Additionally, the Liberals have failed to reduce prohibitive citizenship fees and to adjust the language and knowledge requirements in naturalization procedures (these points are discussed below).…”
Section: Canada's Naturalization Regime and The Civic Integration Par...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Operating in the name of national security, such process makes it difficult or illegitimate to debate citizenship revocation as a matter of political choices among different visions of justice. With a view to unveiling what is obscured by these depoliticising effects, the papers in this volume explore the historical continuity and socio-political frames underpinning what is investigated here as the 'revival' (Fargues 2019;Winter and Previsic 2019) of citizenship revocation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will look at whether it results not only in the intensification of a number of internal tensions but also in the creation of dilemmas which imply a possible exit from liberal democracy or, at the very least, a decoupling of liberalism and democracy. To analyse this potential shift from tensions to dilemmas, we will return to the three dimensions of citizenshipnamely: rights, participation, identitymentioned in the editors' introduction (Fargues and Winter 2019) and investigated by Winter and Previsic (2019)in relation to Canada. We will then examine how these dimensions relate to each other in terms of a normative priority for setting out the conditions of access to citizenship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%