When States Take Rights Back 2020
DOI: 10.4324/9781003020387-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The politics of un-belonging: lessons from Canada’s experiment with citizenship revocation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the name of security issues, among others, the enforcement of democratic values (Winter and Previsic, 2019) or the protection of national (liberal) cultures has become a determinant criterion to establish whether immigrants deserve full citizenship. Future citizens must be 'liberal', in the sense of being 'committed to liberal values' (Hampshire, 2011).…”
Section: Citizenship and Migration: The Inclusion Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the name of security issues, among others, the enforcement of democratic values (Winter and Previsic, 2019) or the protection of national (liberal) cultures has become a determinant criterion to establish whether immigrants deserve full citizenship. Future citizens must be 'liberal', in the sense of being 'committed to liberal values' (Hampshire, 2011).…”
Section: Citizenship and Migration: The Inclusion Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8. Winter and Previsic (2019) shows in their analysis of the Canadian case that references to Muslims dominated public discourses on citizenship revocation. They conclude that the frequent enumeration of Muslim individuals, groups and events in the context of terrorism contributes to the popular suspicion that Canadian Muslims are, at the very least, sympathetic to terrorism and incapable of truly belonging in Canada.…”
Section: Citizenship and Migration: Towards A Conception Of Citizensh...mentioning
confidence: 99%