The politics of local hospital reform: a case study of hospital reorganization following the 2002 Norwegian hospital reform

Abstract

BackgroundThe Norwegian hospital reform of 2002 was an attempt to make restructuring of hospitals easier by removing politicians from the decision-making processes. To facilitate changes seen as necessary but politically difficult, the central state took over ownership of the hospitals and stripped the county politicians of what had been their main responsibility for decades. This meant that decisions regarding hospital structure and organization were now being taken by professional administrators and not by politically elected representatives. The question raised here is whether this has had any effect on the speed of restructuring of the hospital sector.MethodThe empirical part is a case study of the restructuring process in Innlandet Hospital Trust (IHT), which was one of the largest enterprise established after the hospital reform and where the vision for restructuring was clearly set. Different sources of qualitative data are used in the analysis. These include interviews with key actors, observational data and document studies.ResultsThe analysis demonstrates how the new professional leaders at first acted in accordance with the intentions of the hospital reform, but soon chose to avoid the more ambitious plans for restructuring the hospital structure and in fact reintroduced local politics into the decision-making process. The analysis further illustrates how local networks and engagement of political representatives from all levels of government complicated the decision-making process surrounding local structural reforms. Local political representatives teamed up with other actors and created powerful networks. At the same time, national politicians had incentives to involve themselves in the processes as supporters of the status quo.ConclusionBecause of the incentives that faced political actors and the controversial nature of major hospital reforms, the removal of local politicians and the centralization of ownership did not necessarily facilitate reforms in the hospital structure. Keeping politics at an arm's length may simply be unrealistic and further complicate the politics of local hospital reforms.

Analysis of the Structure of Public Hospitals Administration in Iran: A Qualitative Study

“…Increases in induced demand were presented as a weakness in the evidence examined. However, one of the present study's strengths was that it included expert opinions of the government structure, which contradicted the results of similar studies (11)(12)(13)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33).…”

“…2021; 10(2):e112125. cept in designing a comprehensive and efficient evaluation system, were inconsistent with the findings of the studies, but in this study, experts announced that the development of performance evaluation indicators for monitoring public hospitals was not found in the studies (9,13,25,30). Zhao and Zhang (2018), in their qualitative study conducted through interviews with experts to address the problems of public hospitals, the result of this study showed that delegate authorities to hospitals, decentralization, development of performance indicators could improved public hospital.…”

The impact of change in a doctor's job position: a five-year cohort study of job satisfaction among Norwegian doctors

“…This study is in line with previous studies that show a higher level of job satisfaction among general practitioners than among hospital doctors in Norway [ 6 - 8 ]. Norwegian health-care services were reformed in recent years with more cost- and consumer-based alternatives for hospital doctors provided by the Norwegian hospital reform of 2002 [ 25 , 26 ] and the establishment of a patient-list general practice outside of hospitals in 2001 [ 27 ]. A study in 2010 showed that these reforms had little impact on physician job satisfaction, and the article concluded that it seemed likely that physician job satisfaction was based more on internal values than external changes [ 8 ].…”

Countries' experiences in reforming hospital administration structure based on the Parker and Harding model: A systematic review study

“…Finally, 39 cases were included in the study [ Figure 1 ]. [ 3 4 23 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 ] Reviewed evidence includes books and reports (3 cases) and scientific articles published in journals (36 cases).…”