The “Politics of History” as a Case of Foreign-Policy Making

Astrov, Alexander

doi:10.1515/9786155225468-006

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The efficacy of these interpretations as foundational myths relies on their clarity and simplicity. As a result, the different groups assign the roles of victim or perpetrator to the different historical actors that they seek to represent and they generally follow what Astrov (2012) referred to as ‘a certain grammar’ (p. 118). Taken together, these two factors indicate a commensurability that enables a ‘dialogical’ or ‘intertextual’ relationship between the different narratives, which I explore and later link to the political interactions between them.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The transnational mythscape of the Second World War

Galai

2019

Memory Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since the early 2000s, the study of European Memory politics has proliferated, but has come to mean different things. It focuses either on the emergence of Holocaust remembrance as a shared cultural memory, disputes within European Union institutions over what the European collective memory should be, or diplomatic standoffs between Russia and its former satellites. I argue that while such complex multi-level memory politics defy an overarching theoretical categorisation, they can be understood through a comprehensive approach, which is achieved by considering the different narratives of the past to be interpretations of a common historical occurrence. This article argues that European Memory Politics as a whole occurs within a transnational mythscape of the Second World War, in which international actors promote their interpretations as simplified myths while warding off competing myths that negatively depict their mythical selves. An emergent narrative alliance between Russia and Israel, made in response to European memory politics, is used to illustrate the utility of the transnational mythscape framework for understanding memory politics beyond the national sphere.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%