2019
DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2019.1618384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The politics of fiscal consolidation and reform under external constraints in the European periphery: comparative study of Hungary and Latvia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In December 2008, EU member Latvia asked the IMF for help (followed by Romania and Ukraine, not covered here) (IMF 2013a). In both countries, foreign exchange debt problems (bank loans in foreign currency for household mortgages, plus foreign-owned private and public debt) formed the core of the debt-default crisis (Cepilovs and Török 2019).…”
Section: Bailouts In 2008mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In December 2008, EU member Latvia asked the IMF for help (followed by Romania and Ukraine, not covered here) (IMF 2013a). In both countries, foreign exchange debt problems (bank loans in foreign currency for household mortgages, plus foreign-owned private and public debt) formed the core of the debt-default crisis (Cepilovs and Török 2019).…”
Section: Bailouts In 2008mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between both countries was that all the large banks in Hungary were foreign-owned (with parent banks providing liquidity), whereas Latvia had a large insolvent domestic bank (Parex) to be rescued. Moreover, Hungary devaluated the Forint, whereas Latvia insisted on maintaining the fixed currency peg (Cepilovs and Török 2019).…”
Section: Bailouts In 2008mentioning
confidence: 99%