The politics of finance: cultural economy, cultural studies and the road ahead

Hardin, Carolyn

doi:10.1080/17530350.2017.1297249

Cited by 17 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Tidak hanya pada sector masyarakat yang masih kurang kesadarannya untuk melakukan aktivitas-aktivitas ekonomi secara mandiri, melainkan dipengaruhi juga oleh kebijakan yang tumpang tindih. Belum lagi karena pengaruh kebijakan ekonomi politik yang sampai hari ini mengundang perdebatan karena seringkali berubah sesuai dengan kondisi ekonomi global membuat Negara tidak memiliki otoritas yang kuat dalam menentukan laju pertumbuhan ekonominya sendiri (Hardin, 2017).…”

Section: Kesimpulanunclassified

SDG’s dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi Pasca Pandemi

Mubin¹

2021

jiss

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Program SDGs di Indonesia sangat penting untuk diwujudkan mengingat konflik ekonomi sangat tinggi dan terus berubah dari waktu ke waktu. Dengan kondisi perekonomian Indonesia yang selalu mengalami kendala akibat dampak kepentingan politik dan intervensi asing yang kuat, diperlukan sejumlah inovasi dan kebijakan agar pencapaian SDGs di bidang pertumbuhan ekonomi dan penyerapan tenaga kerja dapat terwujud. Salah satu strateginya adalah menciptakan platform ekonomi digital yang menggunakan prinsip kolaborasi dari semua pihak dan memperkuat manajemen kebijakan, infrastruktur, dan sektor konsumen. Dasar pemikiran ini tidak terlepas dari kuatnya intervensi asing yang merupakan konsekuensi dari utang negara yang selalu meningkat setiap tahunnya. Melalui instruksi Presiden Jokowi, pemerintah pada tahun 2021 telah fokus pada program pembangunan berkelanjutan sebagaimana tertuang dalam kesepakatan internasional, salah satunya adalah pertumbuhan ekonomi dan penyerapan tenaga kerja.

show abstract

Section: Kesimpulanunclassified

SDG’s dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi Pasca Pandemi

Mubin¹

2021

jiss

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…At the same time, the analyses presented here are not limited to so-called developing economies but indeed trouble the distinction between 'developing' and 'developed' by attending to the entanglement of transnational and local forms of infrastructural supports, constraints, and aspirations (Kar and Schuster 2016). The contributors respond to recent calls in the social studies of money and finance to stitch together how the everyday life of financial practices 'connects up to high finance' (Tooker and Maurer 2016) and pursue methods of 'provisional framework building' (Hardin 2017) in arriving at the ethnographic grounds and grounding of the politics of finance (Zaloom 2019). They thereby demonstrate why it is imperative to understand how diverse actors are promoting, modifying, politicizing, or contesting state and industry-led technological intermediation for managing financial systems and adjudicating the economic well being of citizens and statesfrom the war on cash, to recent attempts at demonetization to ever-greater reliance on digital financial instruments (Dalinghaus 2017b(Dalinghaus , 2019.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mapping the intermediate: lived technologies of money and value

Tankha

Dalinghaus

2020

Journal of Cultural Economy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As financial transactions are increasingly digitized, old and new kinds of intermediaries are only expanding in importance. Intermediaries, mediators and brokers sit at critical junctures and operate between diverse financial arenas and pathways. We argue that mapping the intermediate entails identifying how different kinds of actors-human and non-human, objects and interfaces, institutions and practices-delimit or reify but also stitch together and overcome spatial and temporal differences in people's financial lives, while taking on varying burdens of risk. Mapping the intermediate is both an empirical and methodological exercise. Empirically, it requires following the agents and traders, brokers and material objects that facilitate transactions and add, extract, or rework different kinds of value. Methodologically, intermediaries and the intermediate are not only the objects of analysis but act as analytical tools in their own right, making the process and politics of transactions visible and tangible. Attending to the intermediate in our inquiries around money, currency and new digital financial technologies, thereby, offers new directions for grounding finance in politics and history and better connecting micro and macro and local and global economic processes.

show abstract

Has financial development benefited the performance of publicly traded cultural and creative firms? Evidence from China

Yan

Uddin

2019

J Cult Econ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The politics of finance: cultural economy, cultural studies and the road ahead

Cited by 17 publications

References 28 publications

SDG’s dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi Pasca Pandemi

SDG’s dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi Pasca Pandemi

Mapping the intermediate: lived technologies of money and value

Has financial development benefited the performance of publicly traded cultural and creative firms? Evidence from China

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About