1982
DOI: 10.2307/3817297
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Politics of Contracting: Los Angeles County and the Lakewood Plan, 1954-1962

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Lakewood case proved an attractive pattern for suburbanites to gain local-control without incurring the expenses of creating a full-service municipality. Besides, the passage of California's bill of one-percent local sales tax in 1956 also created an important new source of revenue for local governments, making cityhood more viable in many communities with extensive retailing businesses (Lewis, 2000;Schiesl, 1982;Bollans & Scoot, 1951).…”
Section: The Incorporation Issue and Local Politicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Lakewood case proved an attractive pattern for suburbanites to gain local-control without incurring the expenses of creating a full-service municipality. Besides, the passage of California's bill of one-percent local sales tax in 1956 also created an important new source of revenue for local governments, making cityhood more viable in many communities with extensive retailing businesses (Lewis, 2000;Schiesl, 1982;Bollans & Scoot, 1951).…”
Section: The Incorporation Issue and Local Politicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Hampton Roads, Virginia area, for example, there are intergovernmental agreements that cover services ranging from jails, to bus service, to water treatment. Perhaps the best-known example of intergovernmental agreements in public works is the Lakewood Plan, a consortium of southern California cities that collectively provide nearly all municipal public works functions under the auspices of a series of intergovernmental agreements (Schiesl, 1982).…”
Section: Box 3: High Accountability Low Competitionmentioning
confidence: 99%