The Politics of Benchcraft: The Role of Judges in Mental Health Courts

Abstract

Mental health courts (MHCs) offer community‐based treatment in lieu of criminal prosecution for chronic offenders with psychiatric disabilities, and MHC judges enjoy expanded powers to achieve the court's objectives. Because scholars know little about how judges transition into a new occupational role in the problem‐solving courtroom, this ethnographic study of four MHCs in the United States focuses on how judges learn to orchestrate their responses to treatment noncompliance in this novel court setting. The goal of this article is to examine the professionalization of MHC judges and the emergent craft of therapeutic adjudication. To achieve this goal, I investigate judicial strategies for motivating, questioning, and defending participants accused of wrongdoing. I conclude that the art and practice of problem‐solving justice requires judges to rise to the larger institutional challenges embedded in the alternative courtroom, a process I call the politics of benchcraft.

Worthy of Justice: A Veterans Treatment Court in Practice

“…For the first several months of court observations, it was difficult to ascertain what made this court for veterans distinct from a regular drug or mental health treatment court. As in other treatment courts, the “theatrical direction” fostered an image of collaboration between the various personnel and participants (Castellano ). The judge called individual participants to stand at a podium, and the probation officer read a summary of their compliance and progress through the treatment program .…”

Targeted sympathy in “whore court”: Criminal justice actors' perceptions of prostitution diversion programs

“…Many view drug courts, the most prevalent form of problem‐solving justice (Marlowe et al, 2016), as a means to reassert judicial authority (Castellano, 2017; McCoy, 2003). Miller and Johnson (2009) highlight the courtroom as a performative site in which to motivate defendants through public praise and shaming to change their lives for the better by becoming productive citizens (Singh, 2017).…”

She's Nobody's Child/the Law Can't Touch Her at Alll: Seeking to Bring Dignity to Legal Proceedings Involving Juveniles

“…168 Such TJ-based courts handle a wide array of issues, ranging from family problems and domestic violence to substance abuse and mental health concerns. 171 Problem-solving juvenile courts universally strive to use both consequences and incentives in treatment and recovery plans and focus on "the role and functioning of the youth's family in terms of rehabilitating the youth." 170 In them, judges seek to facilitate creative solutions to the issues presented by each individual offender, encouraging defendants to complete treatment plans in the hopes of increasing compliance with programs tailored to ensure that individuals will avoid the justice system in the future.…”

“…170 In them, judges seek to facilitate creative solutions to the issues presented by each individual offender, encouraging defendants to complete treatment plans in the hopes of increasing compliance with programs tailored to ensure that individuals will avoid the justice system in the future. 171 Problem-solving juvenile courts universally strive to use both consequences and incentives in treatment and recovery plans and focus on "the role and functioning of the youth's family in terms of rehabilitating the youth." 172 Ostensibly, the juvenile justice system-an institution designed to treat and rehabilitate youth-offers a unique opportunity to intervene in the lives of children with mental disabilities before any negative behavioral or psychological patterns take hold.…”