This article explores the material practices through which lower-caste and poor villagers engage with bureaucracy in contemporary India. We take documents and paperwork -such as ration cards and community certificates -as a 'lens' through which to explore how paper materiality is infused with the politics of power, patronage, and identity. The article brings ethnography from rural Tamil Nadu, South India, in conversation with two bodies of literature: one on the materiality of bureaucracy and one on the nature of political mediation in contemporary India. We demonstrate how everyday engagements with paperwork as well as processes of applying, form filling, and securing recommendations are constitutive of social and political relationships and, ultimately, of citizenship itself. Political mediation around paperwork and bureaucracy generates a hierarchy of citizens rather than equal citizenship for all, yet ordinary villagers transpire as anything but passive. Drawing on patronage networks, engaging in affective performances, and navigating a politics of identity, they actively negotiate access to the state in an attempt to claim their rights as citizens.In this article, we explore different material practices through which lower-caste and poor villagers engage with bureaucracy in contemporary India. We zoom in on the materiality of people's everyday interactions with bureaucracy by taking documents and paperwork -such as the cards and certificates that individuals hold or seek to hold -as a 'lens' through which to explore how people's routine interactions with the state bureaucracy are shaped through relations of power, patronage, and identity. We focus on how everyday engagements with cards and documents as well as processes of applying, form filling, and securing signatures are constitutive of social and political relationships and, ultimately, of citizenship.While existing scholarship provides us with insights into the many actors who provide political mediation in India (panchayat [village council] presidents, political brokers, netas, dalaals, and goondas), 1 many of whom operate as a state 'outside the state' (see Ghertner 2017), we still know relatively little about the material practices