2004
DOI: 10.1017/s0003055404041334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Political Salience of Cultural Difference: Why Chewas and Tumbukas Are Allies in Zambia and Adversaries in Malawi

Abstract: This paper explores the conditions under which cultural cleavages become politically salient. It does so by taking advantage of the natural experiment afforded by the division of the Chewa and Tumbuka peoples by the border between Zambia and Malawi. I document that, while the objective cultural differences between Chewas and Tumbukas on both sides of the border are identical, the political salience of the division between these communities is altogether different. I argue that this difference stems from the di… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
344
3
9

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 654 publications
(388 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(29 reference statements)
9
344
3
9
Order By: Relevance
“…al (2011), Huber andArceneaux (2007), Krasno and Green (2008) and Posner (2004)). These studies exploit the general fact that laws, regulations, political parties and advertisement campaigns are strongly influenced by geographical borders.…”
Section: Empirical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…al (2011), Huber andArceneaux (2007), Krasno and Green (2008) and Posner (2004)). These studies exploit the general fact that laws, regulations, political parties and advertisement campaigns are strongly influenced by geographical borders.…”
Section: Empirical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Can development have a double standard and advocate democracy for some, but autocracy for the rest?" In other words, FPIC really rests on an assumption of clearly identified and static cultural identities, and the existence of straightforward division between the powerful and the dispossessed along these static ethnic lines, when most ethnic identities are in fact fluid social constructions, dependent on politics and subject to change (Lucero, 2006;Li, 2000;Posner, 2004;Sylvain, 2002).…”
Section: The Challenges Of Ethnic-based Participatory Governancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since individuals almost always possess multiple social identities (e.g. Roccas and Brewer, 2002;Simmel, 1955), this practice is questionable and the assumption of cultural differences that matter politically must itself be explained (Posner, 2004). Moreover, the mechanism of cultural homophily (McPherson, Smith-Lovin and Cook, 2001;Simpson et al, 2014) may not be the only, or the most important, reason for the political effects of cultural identities: to have an effect, cleavages also need to be activated by political entrepreneurs (Lipset and Rokkan, 1967;Rokkan and Urwin, 1983).…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%