The Political Nature of Digital Cultural Heritage

McCrary, Quincy

doi:10.18352/lq.8000

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Kulturarv er allerede politikk, vil flere hevde, som f.eks. Smith (2004), McCrary (2011 og Ronström (2001Ronström ( , 2008. Etnologen Owe Ronström argumenterer eksempelvis for at relevante studier av kulturarv i prinsippet er studier av kulturarvspolitikk.…”

Section: Kulturpolitiske Konsekvenser Av Kulturarvens Digitaliseringunclassified

#Mangletre - Om makt og ideologi i den digitale kulturarvens politikk

Hylland¹

2014

NKT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ole Marius Hylland er forsker og kulturhistoriker med utdannelse fra Universitetet i Oslo. Han har hovedfag i folkloristikk og skrev sin doktoravhandling i kulturhistorie om folkeopplysning på 1800-tallet. Tidligere har han blant annet arbeidet som foreleser ved Universitetet i Oslo og som seniorrådgiver i ABM-utvikling (Statens senter for arkiv, bibliotek og museum). Hylland har arbeidet ved Telemarksforsking siden 2008 og er fagkoordinator for kulturområdet ved instituttet.

show abstract

Section: Kulturpolitiske Konsekvenser Av Kulturarvens Digitaliseringunclassified

#Mangletre - Om makt og ideologi i den digitale kulturarvens politikk

Hylland¹

2014

NKT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The difference is also emphasised in the disciplinary discourse of digitization, which differentiates between preservation of physical copies and curation of digital copies (Yakel 2007;Abrams, Cruse & Kunze 2009;McCrary 2011). The political nature of the semantic difference between knowledge and heritage was confirmed by Europeana senior staff, who noted that the EU Commission were very adamant regarding the implementing of the cultural heritage discourse into Europeana's communication flow (Interview anonymous senior staff, Europeana, 2011).…”

Section: The European Archive and Its Indexmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Digital Dimension of European Cultural Politics: Index, Intellectual Property and Internet Governance

Thylstrup

2011

Cult. Unbound

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Internet and the World Wide Web (WWW) have become dominant fields for European Union (EU) politics. What used to be at the outer fringes of the EU policies has now taken centre stage. The transnational and dialogical structure of the Internet has hardwired it for international cultural politics, yet the very same structure also works to erode the very territorial foundation of traditional cultural politics. Given the delicate and complex terrain cultural politics traverse in international politics, and the trailblazing progression of the Internet, it seems on-line cultural politics is not just the application of existing cultural politics to cyberspace but a new field to be explored, analyzed and taught. The present article maps a constituent European cultural boundary on the WWW as the EU has circumscribed it and places this cultural node within a wider array of Europeanization and globalization processes.

show abstract

“…The digitization process thus transforms heritage artefacts into dynamic digital material without strong boundaries between data and metadata (Abrams, Cruse & Kunze 2009). The difference is also emphasised in the disciplinary discourse of digitization, which differentiates between preservation of physical copies and curation of digital copies (Yakel 2007;Abrams, Cruse & Kunze 2009;McCrary 2011). The political nature of the semantic difference between knowledge and heritage was confirmed by Europeana senior staff, who noted that the EU Commission were very adamant regarding the implementing of the cultural heritage discourse into Europeana's communication flow (Interview anonymous senior staff, Europeana, 2011).…”

Section: The European Archive and Its Indexmentioning

confidence: 99%

Untitled

2011

Cult. Unbound

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The publishers will keep this document online on the Internet-or its possible replacement-for a considerable time from the date of publication barring exceptional circumstances. The online availability of the document implies a permanent permission for anyone to read, to download, to print out single copies for your own use and to use it unchanged for any non-commercial research and educational purpose. Subsequent transfers of copyright cannot revoke this permission. All other uses of the document are conditional on the consent of the copyright owner. The publisher has taken technical and administrative measures to assure authenticity, security and accessibility. According to intellectual property law the author has the right to be mentioned when his/her work is accessed as described above and to be protected against infringement. For additional information about the Linköping University Electronic Press and its procedures for publication and for assurance of document integrity, please refer to its WWW home page: www.ep.liu.se/.

show abstract

The Political Nature of Digital Cultural Heritage

Cited by 6 publications

References 4 publications

#Mangletre - Om makt og ideologi i den digitale kulturarvens politikk

#Mangletre - Om makt og ideologi i den digitale kulturarvens politikk

The Digital Dimension of European Cultural Politics: Index, Intellectual Property and Internet Governance

Untitled

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About