The Political Face of Public Health

Abstract

Public health is politically paradoxical because its core conceptual componentsthe exercise of public authority and the promotion of population health -stand in practical tension that belies their theoretical promise. Across Western nations, public policymakers stand accused of failing properly to honor and support the crucial contributions that public health makes to the improvement of health outcomes and of overinvesting in acute medical care services, the need for which timely interventions in prevention and health promotion might have averted. The dramatic budgetary discrepancies in Western nations between the massive funds devoted to medical care and the minuscule sums allotted to public health are often taken as evidence that in such matters, political leaders are irrational (or perhaps uninformed, or captured by big-moneyed medical interests) and that good public policy would have epidemiologists and other public health experts running, or at least orchestrating, the show. This paper explores the sources of this tension between population health and political power within the concept of public health and seeks to show why these strains prove to be so durable, indeed irresolvable. The argument and evidence draw largely on the United States, but the supposition -anyway, the hope -is that the analysis will also throw light on the politics of public health in other nations.

The Healthy Hawai‘i Initiative: insights from two decades of building a culture of health in a multicultural state

“…In addition to offering new analysis of the CHAF, our findings contribute to multiple bodies of literature within health policy and public health. This work is congruent with research that shows framing prevention efforts around "vulnerable" populations, especially children, and combining stories with data, are successful strategies to convince policy makers [43][44][45]. Furthermore, our findings build upon literature that highlights the tensions and challenges inherent in building healthier, more equitable communities.…”

Health Care Reform as a Halfway Technology

“…The root causes and pathways leading to premature death, disease, and disability are complicated in practice and even more complicated as subjects of political debate and decision making. Public health is intrinsically political due to its frequent reliance on coercive regulation; its implicit or explicit moral judgments of individuals and groups; and its challenges to the authority, expertise, and livelihoods of organizations and leaders in other sectors of society (Gostin 2000;Morone 2003;Oliver 2006;Marks 2009;Brown 2010;Mayes and McKenna 2010).…”

Editorial: Why an Issue on the New Public Health?

“…10 Lawrence Brown discusses the priority and place of public health in health policy and the need for changes in public policy to address inequities and the full capacity for prevention to improve health status in the US.…”