The political economy of post-secondary education: a comparison of British Columbia, Ontario and Québec

Abstract

A policy sociology approach is taken to examine the connections between neo-liberalism, post-secondary provincial education (PSE) policy in Canada and the impact of those policies. Our thesis regarding the broad political economy of PSE is that over the last two decades the adoption of this ideology has been a major cause of some dramatic changes in these policies and has brought about a fundamental transformation of PSE in Canada. The discussion builds on a comparative, multiple, nested case study conducted at the provincial (Québec, Ontario and British Columbia) and national level. Through the analysis of key provincial and federal documents, the team concludes that five themes dominated the PSE policy-making process. These themes are Accessibility, Accountability, Marketization, Labour Force Development and Research and Development. In discussing these themes, we illustrate their impact on and within the three provincial PSE systems: BC, Ontario and Québec. In the conclusion, we place the changes in their political and economic contexts and explicate the intended and unintended consequences of these policy priorities. We argue that the pressure for access has led to the emergence of new institutional types, raising new questions about differentiation, mandate and identity and new lines of stratification. A trend toward vocationalism in the university sector has coincided with 'academic drift' in the community college sector, leading to convergences in programming and institutional functions across the system, as well as competition for resources, students, and external partners. Unprecedented demand has made education a viable industry, sustaining both a proliferation of private providers and a range of new entrepreneurial activities within public institutions. Levels and objectives of public funding have swung dramatically

Strategic Planning for Sustainability in Canadian Higher Education

“…Although degree-granting status has conventionally distinguished Canadian universities from colleges, there has been an expansion of degree-granting status to the college sector beginning in the 1990s, and an associated renegotiation of institutional identities and boundaries between institutional types [20]. Recent research has highlighted regional differences in higher education policy across the country, such as commercialization trends that are profoundly impacting accountability, research, and other policy areas in varied ways across provinces [21,22].…”

Confronting the social mandate for nursing scholarship – One school of nursing’s journey.

“…In Canada, there has been a blurring of previously distinct institutional mandates of community colleges and universities (Fisher et al, 2009). Whereas colleges have previously held the mandates to offer vocational, non-degree programs in human services and trades and technology, some are now able to grant undergraduate degrees and other institutions such as our own have transitioned into special purpose universities with mandates to continue to grant certificates and diplomas as well as degrees.…”

Technology in Teaching Family Science: What We Do and Why We Do It

“…Rapidly evolving digital technologies have infiltrated daily life, changing the ways we communicate, access information, create and consume media, and how we teach and learn. Post-secondary institutions are situated within the context of these macro changes and are reflecting on how best to respond (Fisher, Rubenson, Jones & Shanahan, 2009;Kandiko, 2010;Marginson & Considine, 2000).At all levels of education, there is a dominant discourse of 'rapid change', increased globalized competition and the knowledge economy (Stomquist, 2002). This has led to calls for shifts in curriculum development and delivery to meet the needs of 'digital natives' (Tapscott, 1998) and 21 st Century learners (Beetham & Sharpe, 2013).…”