2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2298182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Political Economy of Environmental Policy with Overlapping Generations

Abstract: A two-sector OLG model illuminates previously unexamined intergenerational effects of a tax that protects an environmental stock. A traded asset capitalizes the economic returns to future tax-induced environmental improvements, benefiting the current asset owners, the old generation. Absent a transfer, the tax harms the young generation by decreasing their real wage. Future generations benefit from the tax-induced improvement in environmental stock. The principal intergenerational conflict arising from public … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
26
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…None of these studies point to the impact of demographic patterns on savings rates and, subsequently, on climate policies. 9 Karp and Rezai (2014) use an OLG model for a somewhat different purpose. They show that if the environmental benefits of climate policies can be capitalized in an increased value of the capital stock, current generations also benefit from environmental policies.…”
Section: Further Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of these studies point to the impact of demographic patterns on savings rates and, subsequently, on climate policies. 9 Karp and Rezai (2014) use an OLG model for a somewhat different purpose. They show that if the environmental benefits of climate policies can be capitalized in an increased value of the capital stock, current generations also benefit from environmental policies.…”
Section: Further Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, while the literature on instrument choice for environmental policy has established that the carbon price is the most efficient instrument (Pigou, 1932;Goulder and Parry, 2008;Fischer and Newell, 2008), 3 less attention has been paid to their different distributional impacts. Most studies focus on the impact of carbon prices, and look at distribution in terms of different income categories (e.g., Rausch et al, 2010;Fullerton, Heutel and Metcalf, 2012;Coady, Flamini and Sears, 2015;Borenstein and Davis, 2015) or different generations (e.g., Karp and Rezai, 2012). Few papers explore how different policies set costs on different sectors of the economy.…”
Section: Contribution To the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2], которая также близка к исследованиям [3][4][5]7] (Bovenberg, Bovenberg, Heijdra, 2002;Karp, Rezai, 2014), посвящена поиску механизмов снижения и замедления негатив-ного влияния выбросов углеводородов на окружающую среду в рамках модели пере-крывающихся поколений, иллюстрирующей так называемый зеленый парадокс. В частности, в качестве такого механизма авторы предлагают ввести налог на выбросы углеводородов.…”
Section: эффективные меры по борьбе с глобальным потеплениемunclassified