2009
DOI: 10.1080/13597560902753446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Political Dynamics of Secession and Institutional Accommodation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholars are basically divided into two camps: One the one hand the proponents, arguing that regional autonomy can be a suitable solution for multi-ethnic societies (Ghai, 2000;Wolff, 2013), and on the other hand the critics, arguing that autonomy fosters separatist tendencies (Meadwell, 2009;Chapman & Roeder, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars are basically divided into two camps: One the one hand the proponents, arguing that regional autonomy can be a suitable solution for multi-ethnic societies (Ghai, 2000;Wolff, 2013), and on the other hand the critics, arguing that autonomy fosters separatist tendencies (Meadwell, 2009;Chapman & Roeder, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above analysis shows that the Jarso challenged what can be called ‘the territorial status quo’ (Meadwell, 2009: 231) of the Somali Regional State through their identity-based collective mobilization towards protective territoriality. On their part, the Somali Region confronted the Oromiya Region by laying claims to the Jarso-Girhi territory and other territories in the region.…”
Section: Processes That Led To Referendum-based Rival Claims Over Admmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Territorial self-governance establishes the legally entrenched power of territorially delimited entities within the internationally recognized boundaries of existing states to exercise public policy functions independently of other sources of authority in this state, but subject to its overall legal order (Wolff, 2013: 32). A vigorous debate has been ongoing within the civil conflict literature between scholars arguing that the dispersion of power through territorial self-governance arrangements mitigates conflict by affording identity groups a degree of recognition, control and security, and those who maintain that such arrangements aggravate conflict by accentuating differences and providing rebels with greater opportunities to challenge the state, and potentially secede (Bormann et al, 2019;Cederman et al, 2015;Elkins and Sides, 2007;Horowitz, 1985;McGarry, 2007;Meadwell, 2009;Nordlinger, 1972;Vogt et al, 2015). These arguments revolve around the extent of the powers enjoyed by distinct levels of government as well as the foundation of the legitimate exercise of these powers.…”
Section: Territorial Self-governancementioning
confidence: 99%