“…Territorial self-governance establishes the legally entrenched power of territorially delimited entities within the internationally recognized boundaries of existing states to exercise public policy functions independently of other sources of authority in this state, but subject to its overall legal order (Wolff, 2013: 32). A vigorous debate has been ongoing within the civil conflict literature between scholars arguing that the dispersion of power through territorial self-governance arrangements mitigates conflict by affording identity groups a degree of recognition, control and security, and those who maintain that such arrangements aggravate conflict by accentuating differences and providing rebels with greater opportunities to challenge the state, and potentially secede (Bormann et al, 2019;Cederman et al, 2015;Elkins and Sides, 2007;Horowitz, 1985;McGarry, 2007;Meadwell, 2009;Nordlinger, 1972;Vogt et al, 2015). These arguments revolve around the extent of the powers enjoyed by distinct levels of government as well as the foundation of the legitimate exercise of these powers.…”