2020
DOI: 10.31269/triplec.v18i2.1108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Political Defence of the Commons: The Case of Community Networks

Abstract: This article reflects on experiences of political advocacy which have been led by Community Networks activists in Germany, France and Spain to support the sustainability of bottom-up initiatives aiming at building community-owned telecom infrastructures, or “telecommons”. While pointing to the diversity of action repertoires used by various Community Networks across Europe, the article points to the potential of these instances of political advocacy to democratise both telecommunications and policy-making in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What seems evident to us is that the fuzzy boundaries of commons organizing in the literature reflect no more than the social, political, and axiological struggles around a coveted term. Struggles that reflect once more the irresistible pulsion by market forces and governments to enclose the commons even if now at a conceptual level (Tréguer & De Rosnay, 2020). The risk of escalating the terminological debate into different forms of 'commonswashing' or semantic appropriation (De Rosnay, 2019) seems evident to us and should be given further critical consideration.…”
Section: Conclusion Limitations and Notes For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What seems evident to us is that the fuzzy boundaries of commons organizing in the literature reflect no more than the social, political, and axiological struggles around a coveted term. Struggles that reflect once more the irresistible pulsion by market forces and governments to enclose the commons even if now at a conceptual level (Tréguer & De Rosnay, 2020). The risk of escalating the terminological debate into different forms of 'commonswashing' or semantic appropriation (De Rosnay, 2019) seems evident to us and should be given further critical consideration.…”
Section: Conclusion Limitations and Notes For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%