The Political Context of Judicial Review in Indonesia

Abstract

The Constitutional Court of Indonesia plays significant role in securing democracy in Indonesia. In exercising their authorities, including the election result dispute and judicial review, the Court continues to affirm institutional judicial legitimacy and pursue their role to guard 1945 Constitution. The first Chief Justice Jimly Asshiddiqie showed how within five years of the Court's establishment, he could strategically maximize its momentum and build the Court as a respectful institution. The Chief Justice Mahfud M D was then elected to reduce the judicial activism started by Jimly's bench. However, against promises and expectations, Mahfud M D brought the Court to a level far beyond the imagination of the Constitution drafters. Parliament and President tried to limit the Court's authority, not ones, and the Court was able to overcome those constrain. Current various available studies observed only how the Court issued their decisions and solely focus to the impact of the decisions. Scholars slightly ignore other constitutional actors in studying about the Court. In fact, political environment where the Court operated is one of the most important aspects which strengthen the Court's institutional legitimacy. This paper attempts to discover the rise of the Court from political environment view outside the court. Political parties' maturity and political constraint are the key factors that support the development of the Court's institutional power. : pengujian undang-undang, konteks politik, peradilan, kewenangan institusi,, partai politik, demokrasi Indonesia Law Review (2015) 2 : 208 -237 Keywords

Demand-Side Constitutionalism: How Indonesian NGOs Set the Constitutional Court’s Agenda and Inform the Justices

“…The MPR established the Constitutional Court because it was concerned about the fragmentation of political power in the aftermath of democratisation (Mietzner, 2010;Siregar, 2015). After the 1999 elections, no party held a majority in the MPR; the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (Partai Demokrasi Indonesia -Perjuangan, PDI-P), the largest party, controlled less than a third of the seats.…”

Preview of Draft Laws Practice Indonesia and France: Current Discussions on Common Areas of Interest

“…Apart from examining the creation process, the revision of laws and regulations can also be done by scrutinizing the effectiveness of their implementation over time. This can be achieved through periodic evaluations conducted by the founders themselves, such as the DPR for laws (commonly known as legislative review) (Butt & Parsons, 2014;Siregar, 2015). Hence, if we examine the exemplary approach adopted by France, which involves a scrutiny by an independent entity in the evaluation of a proposed legislation -commonly referred to as the Draft Bill -by means of a constitutional council established under the Constitution of French Republic, it leads to the formulation of a bill approved by both the National Assembly and the Senate that is forwarded for assessment to the constitutional council prior to its enactment as a law.…”