The Palgrave Handbook of Slavic Languages, Identities and Borders 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-137-34839-5_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Polish Livonian Legacy in Latgalia: The Confluence of Slavic Ethnolects in the Baltic-Slavic Borderland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The varieties of 'modern Rusyn language' differ greatly from the Ukrainian dialects North and South of the Carpathians. Apart from the internal development of the dialect at all levels, the diversity of the variety 'modern Rusyn language' is the result of different language contacts throughout history (Gibson 2016;Danylenko 2016;Magosci 2016;Moser 2016, among others).…”
Section: Vojvodina Rusynmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The varieties of 'modern Rusyn language' differ greatly from the Ukrainian dialects North and South of the Carpathians. Apart from the internal development of the dialect at all levels, the diversity of the variety 'modern Rusyn language' is the result of different language contacts throughout history (Gibson 2016;Danylenko 2016;Magosci 2016;Moser 2016, among others).…”
Section: Vojvodina Rusynmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Latgalian group stands out with regard to the large number of taxa used, whereas Old Believers exhibit a comparably lower number of used taxa (Figure 8, Table 3). This might be explained by the general nature of Old Believers and their conservative views on customs and religion (Zielińska 2017), as well as the nature of isolation (Gibson 2016). Abbreviations: ^Total number of interviewees.…”
Section: The Differences and Similarities Among The Groups Based On Families And Taxamentioning
confidence: 99%