2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2016.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The policy and politics of the 2015 long-term care reform in the Netherlands

Abstract: As of 2015 a major reform in LTC is taking place in the Netherlands. An important objective of the reform is to reign in expenditure growth to safeguard the fiscal sustainability of LTC. Other objectives are to improve the quality of LTC by making it more client-tailored. The reform consists of four interrelated pillars: a normative reorientation, a shift from residential to non-residential care, decentralization of non-residential care and expenditure cuts. The article gives a brief overview of these pillars … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
128
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
128
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In 2012, waiting lists for nursing homes and home care were short (CVZ, 2013). Mandatory social security contributions and general government revenue pay for nine-tenth of total costs (Schut et al, 2013); in 2012, only 8% was financed through cost-sharing (Maarse & Jeurissen, 2016). 8 Co-payments increase with income, yet they do not exceed the cost of care nor the user's income.…”
Section: The Dutch Long-term Care Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2012, waiting lists for nursing homes and home care were short (CVZ, 2013). Mandatory social security contributions and general government revenue pay for nine-tenth of total costs (Schut et al, 2013); in 2012, only 8% was financed through cost-sharing (Maarse & Jeurissen, 2016). 8 Co-payments increase with income, yet they do not exceed the cost of care nor the user's income.…”
Section: The Dutch Long-term Care Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…church groups), before committing to providing these services from the public tax-funded budget (Maarse and Jeurissen, 2016).…”
Section: Irelandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. Unfortunately, the lack of a clear and uniform set of rules prevented us from including in the study of countries such as Denmark (Schulz, 2010), Italy (Da Roit & Le Bihan, 2010;Gori, 2012), the Netherlands (Maarse & Jeurissen, 2016;Mot &Aouragh, 2010), andSweden (Socialstyrelsen, 2009). Finally, we could not include Scotland for two reasons: first, from the institutional point of view Scotland is a hybrid, since the regulation defines four levels of need-of-care (critical, substantial, moderate, low), where only the first two grant eligibility for care, but, to our knowledge, Scotland does not adopt nation-wide guidelines on how the assessment of need should be performed, so that the criteria are defined at the council level; second, results from the Scottish health survey Healthy Ageing in Scotland (HAGIS) have not yet been released to the scientific community, as its first wave was launched in 2016.…”
Section: Dimensions and Main Outcomes Of Vulnerability In The Europeamentioning
confidence: 99%