2009
DOI: 10.1134/s1063772909030093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The polarization of the solar corona on March 29, 2006

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we report detailed observations of the combination of coronal polarization and the polarization of the surrounding sky. Such neutral points were predicted by [17], and (hints of them) also observed for earlier solar eclipses [18][19][20][21]. Much in the same fashion as the occurrence of polarization neutral points arXiv:2007.12482v1 [astro-ph.SR] 23 Jul 2020 in the cloud-free sky due to the cancellation of the tangential polarization due to single Rayleigh scattering by the vertical multiple-scattering component, we observe polarization neutral points where the tangential coronal polarization due to Thomson scattering is cancelled by the multiply scattered sky polarization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Here, we report detailed observations of the combination of coronal polarization and the polarization of the surrounding sky. Such neutral points were predicted by [17], and (hints of them) also observed for earlier solar eclipses [18][19][20][21]. Much in the same fashion as the occurrence of polarization neutral points arXiv:2007.12482v1 [astro-ph.SR] 23 Jul 2020 in the cloud-free sky due to the cancellation of the tangential polarization due to single Rayleigh scattering by the vertical multiple-scattering component, we observe polarization neutral points where the tangential coronal polarization due to Thomson scattering is cancelled by the multiply scattered sky polarization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…This difference is apparently caused by the insufficient quality of our coronal images. In fact, the contribution of wellknown physical causes leading to deviation of the measured polarization direction from the tangential direction is in the range of 1 -2 degrees at R ≤ 2R o (Molodensky, 1973;Molodenskii et al, 2009). distributions of the total polarization degree P KF (L) in these structures, passing through the centers of structures near the Sun; (c) "trajectories" from which distributions of the polarization degree were deduced; (d) comparison between our P KF (L) distributions in the plume and inter-plume regions, and those in the plume (star) and inter-plumes (cross) for the eclipse of 3 November 1994 (Koutchmy, 1994).…”
Section: Polarization Directionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[] and Molodenskii et al . [] cited χ < 1–2° in the low K‐corona and possible appearance of large deviations for specific areas in the range > 1.5–2 R ⊙ caused by sky polarization. We note that cited results correspond to selected position angle cuts.…”
Section: Total Solar Eclipse As An Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Figure 4 by Ozkan et al, [2002], there are χ up to 15°i n the range < 1.5 R ⊙ for the corona of 11 August 1999. Koutchmy et al [1999] and Molodenskii et al [2009] cited χ < 1-2°in the low K-corona and possible appearance of large deviations for specific areas in the range > 1.5-2 R ⊙ caused by sky polarization. We note that cited results correspond to selected position angle cuts.…”
Section: High-precision 2-d Linear Polarimetrymentioning
confidence: 99%