1966
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.aa.04.090166.001333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Polarization of Cosmic Radio Waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
121
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
121
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Faraday rotation by a foreground screen can produce beam depolarization (Gardner & Whiteoak 1966). Longer wavelengths will exhibit this effect to a higher degree because of the k 2 nature of Faraday rotation.…”
Section: Fractional Polarization Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Faraday rotation by a foreground screen can produce beam depolarization (Gardner & Whiteoak 1966). Longer wavelengths will exhibit this effect to a higher degree because of the k 2 nature of Faraday rotation.…”
Section: Fractional Polarization Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(12)- (13) RM gradient of 770 rad m À2 across a beam is sufficient to cause substantial depolarization at 8 GHz. To more quantitatively account for the observed fractional polarization, the beam depolarization can be modeled in the same manner as depolarization due to internal Faraday rotation (Gardner & Whiteoak 1966). The observed fractional polarization is a sinc function of the RM.…”
Section: Fractional Polarization Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where p0 is the intrinsic fractional polarization and ǫ is the synchrotron emissivity at a depth along the line of sight (Burn 1966;Gardner & Whiteoak 1966;Sokoloff et al 1998). The polarization angle φ(x, y) is given by φ(x, y) = φ0 + 812…”
Section: Depolarization Toward the Radio Relicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon is known as the Faraday effect and the angle by which it rotates (Δψ) in a Faraday thin medium is proportional to the rotation measure (RM): Δψ = λ 2 RM. Furthermore, the RM is proportional to the line-of-sight integral over the density of thermal electrons multiplied by the strength of the regular field component parallel to the LOS: RM ∝ n e B dl (Gardner & Whiteoak 1966). With the RM distribution one can correct the polarization angles for Faraday rotation and also obtain information about the strength (if we have knowledge of n e ) and the direction of the Based on observations with the 100 m telescope of the MPIfR (Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie) at Effelsberg and the VLA operated by the NRAO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%