2020
DOI: 10.1002/ange.202007706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Polarization Effect in Surface‐Plasmon‐Induced Photocatalysis on Au/TiO2 Nanoparticles

Abstract: Controlling the interaction of polarization light with an asymmetric nanostructure such as a metal/semiconductor heterostructure provides opportunities for tuning surface plasmon excitation and near‐field spatial distribution. However, light polarization effects on interfacial charge transport and the photocatalysis of plasmonic metal/semiconductor photocatalysts are unclear. Herein, we reveal the polarization dependence of plasmonic charge separation and spatial distribution in Au/TiO2 nanoparticles under 45°… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 49 ] In all these cases, where metals are included, we observe a slow rise and a relatively faster fall in the photoresponse except at cPhC slabs, where the additional PR layer increases the decay time. At 565 and 660 nm light exposures, we observe current modulation due to the charge transfers mediated by localized surface plasmon resonance of single nanoparticles [ 50 ] at 504 nm and aggregations [ 51 ] at 686 nm, (Figure S5c, Supporting Information), respectively. For the mPhC slabs, periodic exposure at 565 nm creates a weak photoresponse covered with background noises; the response becomes stronger as the excitation wavelength is increased toward the hybrid modes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 49 ] In all these cases, where metals are included, we observe a slow rise and a relatively faster fall in the photoresponse except at cPhC slabs, where the additional PR layer increases the decay time. At 565 and 660 nm light exposures, we observe current modulation due to the charge transfers mediated by localized surface plasmon resonance of single nanoparticles [ 50 ] at 504 nm and aggregations [ 51 ] at 686 nm, (Figure S5c, Supporting Information), respectively. For the mPhC slabs, periodic exposure at 565 nm creates a weak photoresponse covered with background noises; the response becomes stronger as the excitation wavelength is increased toward the hybrid modes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26−29 It is also possible to transfer the hot carriers to neighboring catalysts like semiconductors and transition metals to facilitate the heterogeneous reactions on their surfaces. 30,31 The combination of ultrasensitive chemically specific detection and the ability to generate hot carriers endows plasmonic materials the ability to visualize and manipulate the heterogeneous catalysis at a subatomic level. Their potential has been demonstrated in a wide range of heterogeneous catalyses including water splitting, 32,33 Suzuki−Miyaura reactions, 31,34 and CO 2 reduction.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, polarization has become one of the most effective strategies to overcome the above problems and greatly promotes photocatalysis efficiency. [15][16][17][18][19] Bi 3 Fe 0.5 Nb 1.5 O 9 (BFNO) is selected and used to form a spontaneous polarized electric field. Without external stress, a spontaneous polarized electric field is generated to drive the photogenerated carriers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%