1987
DOI: 10.1016/0378-4371(87)90260-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The polarizability of a truncated sphere on a substrate I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
127
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
127
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Here we show that greatly enhanced local electric fields are produced at the SIGN surface, even at the off-resonant wavelengths of 800 nm, according to the theoretical calculation based on the quasi-static approximation [9,10,13]. Figure 4(a) shows the calculated amplitude of the local electric field component normal to the SIGN surface, E loc , as a function of the polar angle θ along the meridian at the azimuthal angle ϕ 0°f rom the x axis, when a p-polarized unit electric field, E 0 1, is applied at an angle of incidence of 45°.…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here we show that greatly enhanced local electric fields are produced at the SIGN surface, even at the off-resonant wavelengths of 800 nm, according to the theoretical calculation based on the quasi-static approximation [9,10,13]. Figure 4(a) shows the calculated amplitude of the local electric field component normal to the SIGN surface, E loc , as a function of the polar angle θ along the meridian at the azimuthal angle ϕ 0°f rom the x axis, when a p-polarized unit electric field, E 0 1, is applied at an angle of incidence of 45°.…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The gap between the SIGN and the surface is supported by an aminoundecanethiol (AUT) self-assembled monolayer (SAM). The SIGNs show an intense resonance of LSPs, as a result of the EM interaction between the SIGNs and the gold surface [9][10][11][12][13]. Second-order NLO optical phenomena, second-harmonic generation (SHG) [10,11], OR and the Pockels effect [12], have been observed from the SIGNs, since the SIGN structure is noncentrosymmetric.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other works where the polarizability of an object at an interface was considered, either "free" polarization is assumed, or the question of whether excess or net dipole moments were used in the definition was not made clear [11,14,21,22]. Other treatments of scattering by dielectric spheres partially embedded at an interface are given in [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Polarizability Of a Conducting Scatterer In An Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a certain degree of symmetry exists, however, some results in this direction can be obtained, as will be explained in the following subsection. Otherwise, numerical methods will have to be used in general, either specialized ones such as those in [14,[26][27][28][29] or general ones such as FDTD or finite-elements ( [25], for example).…”
Section: Polarizability Of a Scatterer At Or Near A Dielectric Interfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present work goes beyond that, taking into account retardation effects, allowing us to correctly describe the imaginary part of the polarizability. It should be noted that the problem of determining the nanoparticle's polarizability in the presence of a homogeneous flat dielectric substrate has also been considered previously both in the electrostatic approximation [20] and in the full electrodynamic approach [6,21,22]. Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%