1976
DOI: 10.1070/rc1976v045n09abeh002715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Polarity and Strength of the Intermolecular Hydrogen Bond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We speculate that the interfacial interaction of other functionalities in the polymers to surfaces also contributes to the realization of strong underwater bonding, since the polar–polar interactions and H-bonding between the those functional groups and the attached surface could not be ignored. Previous reports already verified that the higher polarity of polymer can lead to stronger H-bonding . Very interestingly, the dielectric constant of glass and Al 2 O 3 (the surface of Al is always covered by a layer of Al 2 O 3 ) is around 3.8 and 4.5, respectively, which matches quite well with the dielectric constant of polymer IV (3.3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We speculate that the interfacial interaction of other functionalities in the polymers to surfaces also contributes to the realization of strong underwater bonding, since the polar–polar interactions and H-bonding between the those functional groups and the attached surface could not be ignored. Previous reports already verified that the higher polarity of polymer can lead to stronger H-bonding . Very interestingly, the dielectric constant of glass and Al 2 O 3 (the surface of Al is always covered by a layer of Al 2 O 3 ) is around 3.8 and 4.5, respectively, which matches quite well with the dielectric constant of polymer IV (3.3).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Previous reports already verified that the higher polarity of polymer can lead to stronger H-bonding. 32 Very interestingly, the dielectric constant of glass and Al 2 O 3 (the surface of Al is always covered by a layer of Al 2 O 3 ) is around 3.8 and 4.5, respectively, which matches quite well with the dielectric constant of polymer IV (3.3). We also test the bonding strength of the four polymers on PTFE, a substrate with a very low surface energy, and the results were shown in Figure S11.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The magnitudes of the −Δ H formation values measured in the present work are consistent with values for strong hydrogen bond complexes reported in the literature. In the past, calorimetry has been used to measure the −Δ H formation of a number of hydrogen bonded acid/base complexes, including compounds similar to those in this study such as pyridine or pyridine−oxides and substituted acetic acids . The enthalpies (11−24 kcal) obtained here for nonylamine (p K a 10.13) are consistent with the values for triethylamine (p K a 10.7) with the series of carboxylic acids.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…224–225 °C; 4 , mp. 167–169 °C) and the different Rf values ( 3 , Rf ≈ 0.2; 4 , Rf ≈ 0.4, solvents: petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 2/3) in thin layer chromatography, we assumed that triol 3 tends to form an intermolecular hydrogen bonding interaction between the 12‐OH and tetrahydrofuran ring, while the ( R )‐epimer 4 is more apt to be involved in intramolecular hydrogen bonding . This hydrogen bonding interaction may affect the accessibility of hydrogen bond donors/acceptors to the 12‐OH and E‐ring of the epimers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%