2006
DOI: 10.1086/503553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Polar Regions of Cassiopeia A: The Aftermath of a Gamma‐Ray Burst?

Abstract: Probably not, but it is interesting nevertheless to investigate just how close Cas A might have come to generating such an event. Focusing on the northeast jet filaments, we analyze the polar regions of the recently acquired very deep 1 Ms Chandra X-ray observation. We infer that the so-called "jet" regions are indeed due to jets emanating from the explosion center, and not due to polar cavities in the circumstellar medium at the time of explosion. We place limits on the equivalent isotropic explosion energy i… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
68
2
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
4
68
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the total kinetic energy of all the pistons is about 1.5×10 50 erg. Thus the pistons/jets represent a relatively small fraction (≈7%) of the remnantʼs energy budget, at odds with previous estimates (e.g., Willingale et al 2003;Laming et al 2006).…”
Section: Spatial Distribution and Chemical Composition Of The Cas A Econtrasting
confidence: 75%
“…We note that the total kinetic energy of all the pistons is about 1.5×10 50 erg. Thus the pistons/jets represent a relatively small fraction (≈7%) of the remnantʼs energy budget, at odds with previous estimates (e.g., Willingale et al 2003;Laming et al 2006).…”
Section: Spatial Distribution and Chemical Composition Of The Cas A Econtrasting
confidence: 75%
“…Using this average value, we estimate a total kinetic energy of the NE/SW bipolar flows of 1 × 10 50 (N knots /3400) (n e /4000 cm −3 ) (f/0.5) erg. Interestingly, this same energy value was estimated by Laming et al (2006) for just the NE jet alone based on hydrodynamical models. Schure et al (2008) derived a lower limit for the jet/counterjet system of ∼ 2 × 10 48 erg also from hydrodynamic modeling.…”
Section: Mass and Energy Of Outer Ejecta Knotssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…However, most researchers now agree that the highvelocity ejecta along the NE-SW limbs of Cas A point to a real and significant asymmetrical expansion of the Cas A supernova (Laming et al 2006;DeLaney et al 2010;Hwang & Laming 2012;Milisavljevic & Fesen 2013). What they disagree on is the importance and relevance of the NE/SW jets to the dynamics of the supernova explosion engine.…”
Section: The Nature Of the Jet/counterjetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While the jets do produce a slight bipolar asymmetry in the ejecta, there is no obvious way in which the jets cause most of the ejecta asymmetries described in Section 4. Furthermore, Cas A's jets do not appear to have enough kinetic energy in order to cause the supernova explosion (Laming et al 2006). Wheeler et al (2008) propose that the structures normally called the "jet" and "counterjet" are not the main jets, but rather secondary instabilities.…”
Section: Nature Of the Explosionmentioning
confidence: 99%