2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2015.03.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Poisson shot noise model of visual short-term memory and choice response time: Normalized coding by neural population size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(91 reference statements)
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we assume that the evidence in the accumulator maps onto the firing rate of a neuron, then the translation from rate to spikes will introduce an additional source of noise in any measure of neural dynamics (Figure 1C; Churchland et al, 2011; Nawrot et al, 2008; Smith, 2010, 2015). This additional source of variability can be added to the model dynamics by assuming that the neural activity is a doubly-stochastic process reflecting both rate variability (trial-by-trial variation in accumulated evidence) and point-process variability (Poisson-like spiking noise).…”
Section: General Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we assume that the evidence in the accumulator maps onto the firing rate of a neuron, then the translation from rate to spikes will introduce an additional source of noise in any measure of neural dynamics (Figure 1C; Churchland et al, 2011; Nawrot et al, 2008; Smith, 2010, 2015). This additional source of variability can be added to the model dynamics by assuming that the neural activity is a doubly-stochastic process reflecting both rate variability (trial-by-trial variation in accumulated evidence) and point-process variability (Poisson-like spiking noise).…”
Section: General Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an information limitation can be reformulated as the result of aggregating a fixed-size pool of opponent-coded Poisson neurons (Smith, 2015) or, more generally, as the normalization of the strength of information within memory based upon stimulus energy (Smith & Sewell, 2013;Smith, Sewell, & Lilburn, 2015). This constraint makes clear predictions for performance across different memory array size conditions, as additional items place additional demands (potentially equal demands) on a fixed information limit.…”
Section: A Sample-size Information Constraintmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When brief nearthreshold stimuli are used, however, like those used by Corbett and Smith (2017), there is a possibility that drift rate means and variances might covary with stimulus difficulty. This possibility arises from the idea that the drift rate mean and variance might both depend on Poisson-like neural coding of stimulus information in perception and visual working memory (Bays, 2014;Smith, 2010Smith, , 2015Smith & McKenzie, 2011). We considered this possibility by allowing mean drift rate and variance to both vary with stimulus contrast: Specifically, we allowed η to vary with contrast and stimulus condition (single-versus double-target trials).…”
Section: Parameterizing the 4d Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%