2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2009.11.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The point of zero charge of phyllosilicate minerals using the Mular–Roberts titration technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Apparent PZC values of serpentine and chlorite obtained by a salt addition (Mular-Roberts) method are reported in [12]. This method is based on the assumption that the titration curves obtained at different ionic strengths have a common intersection point CIP, which is true for metal oxides, but not necessarily for serpentine or chlorite.…”
Section: Examples Of Erroneous And/or Misleading Results Reported In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apparent PZC values of serpentine and chlorite obtained by a salt addition (Mular-Roberts) method are reported in [12]. This method is based on the assumption that the titration curves obtained at different ionic strengths have a common intersection point CIP, which is true for metal oxides, but not necessarily for serpentine or chlorite.…”
Section: Examples Of Erroneous And/or Misleading Results Reported In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Charge on this surface predominantly arises from lattice defects or incongruent dissolution (Alvarez-Silva et al, 2010). In contrast, the edge of a chlorite crystal -e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inaccuracy of the zeta potential method for clay minerals has been demonstrated through the deviation of the i.e.p and the p.z.c. These values coincide for isotropically charged particles such as quartz, but differ for anisotropically charged particles [26,27].…”
Section: Surface Charge Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 99%