2012
DOI: 10.1307/mmj/1331222847
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The ∞-Poincaré inequality on metric measure spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The argument also shows that S a does not support an ∞-Poincaré inequality. See [12] for the definition. Note that the ∞-Poincaré inequality is weaker than the p-Poincaré inequality for any finite p.…”
Section: Failure Of the Poincaré Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The argument also shows that S a does not support an ∞-Poincaré inequality. See [12] for the definition. Note that the ∞-Poincaré inequality is weaker than the p-Poincaré inequality for any finite p.…”
Section: Failure Of the Poincaré Inequalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where B ranges over balls in M of radius r. Recall that (P p ) is weaker and weaker as p increases, that is (P p ) implies (P q ) for q > p, see for instance [36], and the p = ∞ version is trivial in the Riemannian setting (see however interesting developments for more general metric measure spaces in [24] [25,Section 5]. On conical manifolds with compact basis, (P p ) holds at least for p ≥ 2 (see [15]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rst statement can be found in Theorem 17.1 of [6]. The second can be found (in greater generality than we need here) in [9], Theorem 4.7.…”
Section: (B) For Any Bounded Lipschitz Function U On Xmentioning
confidence: 86%