2017
DOI: 10.4172/2591-7641.1000009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pockmark stars: radial structures in the seabed surrounding the Hawaii Islands

Roberto Spina
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within each swath of data, the variables of distance, azimuth, and elevation angles will influence significantly the quality of the data. This variability will translate through to the DBM and subsequent users, if unfamiliar with the original acquisition geometry, may potentially misinterpret such variability as real attributes on the seabed, particularly if the artefacts are at the same scale as the morphologic features of interest [31]. Hughes Clarke [30] warns of the uncertainty that can arise with the ever-increasing ambition of higher-resolution data and cautions that relief close to either the resolution limit or the scale of artefacts increases the risk of over-interpretation by morphological studies.…”
Section: Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within each swath of data, the variables of distance, azimuth, and elevation angles will influence significantly the quality of the data. This variability will translate through to the DBM and subsequent users, if unfamiliar with the original acquisition geometry, may potentially misinterpret such variability as real attributes on the seabed, particularly if the artefacts are at the same scale as the morphologic features of interest [31]. Hughes Clarke [30] warns of the uncertainty that can arise with the ever-increasing ambition of higher-resolution data and cautions that relief close to either the resolution limit or the scale of artefacts increases the risk of over-interpretation by morphological studies.…”
Section: Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%