1981
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-5844-5_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Plectomycete Centrum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Ascosphaera species were placed with class Plectomycetes, based on the cleistothecial type of the fruiting bodies (ascomata) (Skou, 1972). This traditional system of classification has been criticized due to its artificial nature because some phenotypic characteristics are unstable and dependent on environmental conditions (Cain, 1972;Malloch, 1981). Considering that in many cases some characters of ascoma can converge, Hawksworth et al (1983) proposed to classify according to order in phylum Ascomycota without a class-level organization.…”
Section: Taxonomic Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ascosphaera species were placed with class Plectomycetes, based on the cleistothecial type of the fruiting bodies (ascomata) (Skou, 1972). This traditional system of classification has been criticized due to its artificial nature because some phenotypic characteristics are unstable and dependent on environmental conditions (Cain, 1972;Malloch, 1981). Considering that in many cases some characters of ascoma can converge, Hawksworth et al (1983) proposed to classify according to order in phylum Ascomycota without a class-level organization.…”
Section: Taxonomic Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One example is the term "plectomycete," which has been defined as a closed ascoma (162) and also as scattered asci within the ascomal cavity (317). Another problem inherent in traditional classifications is the convergence of fruiting bodies (77,320). It has been demonstrated that species which normally produce flask-shaped fruiting bodies can be induced to form closed fruiting bodies under certain environmental conditions (563).…”
Section: Ascomycotamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This monotypic genus is differentiated from Monascus by the sessile cleistothecia, consistently 2-spored asci, plano-convex (D-shaped) ascospores, and its extremely xerophilic nature. The genus was removed from the Monascaceae and included in the Pyronemataceae Corda (Pezizales) by Malloch (1981) because of the sessile cleistothecia. Further information on this remarkable fungus is given by Pitt and Hocking (1982).…”
Section: Excluded Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%