1981
DOI: 10.1080/01418618108240401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The plasticity of polycrystalline ice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
1
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
66
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several physical and microstructural characteristics influence its strength. Low lattice (and grain-boundary) diffusivity, leading to relatively slower matrix relaxation, and larger grains (usually > 1 mm), leading to slower grainboundary diffusion, are primarily responsible [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several physical and microstructural characteristics influence its strength. Low lattice (and grain-boundary) diffusivity, leading to relatively slower matrix relaxation, and larger grains (usually > 1 mm), leading to slower grainboundary diffusion, are primarily responsible [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear portion has a slope of Q /nR = 714. Below 8.3°C, the activation energy for power law creep is Q ≈ 80 KJ mole -1 (Goodman et al, 1981). This implies a creep power of n = 8x10 4 (714)(8.3) = 13.5 (19) This is significantly higher than n ≈ 3 observed at stresses below 1MPa.…”
Section: The Apparent Coefficient Of Friction Of Frozen Cracksmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…This implies a creep power of n = 8x10 4 (714)(8.3) = 13.5 (19) This is significantly higher than n ≈ 3 observed at stresses below 1MPa. However, n for ice is observed to rise rapidly at stresses above 1 MPa (Goodman et al, 1981), so this may simply reflect a higher flow stress on the asperities.…”
Section: The Apparent Coefficient Of Friction Of Frozen Cracksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12 shows that Qf, could be greater than the creep activation energy, Q, involving no cracks and furthermore could depend on stress and temperature. It must be pointed out that the numerical value for Q I assumed here is not different from the activation energy for self-diffusion [22, 5 1, 521, although creep in ice may not be diffusion-controlled but glide-controlled [53], and was determined by Sinha [32] for the range -44 to In discussing the activation ehergy for steadystate, or rather minimum, creep rate of polycrystalline ice experimentally determined high values above -10" C (0.96 T, ) were treated by Weertman [5 11 as unrealistic. Examinations of experimental conditions used, for example, by Glen [54] and Barnes etal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%