2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2008.03.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The plasticity of estrogen receptor–DNA complexes: Binding affinity and specificity of estrogen receptors to estrogen response element half-sites separated by variant spacers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The SNAP data indicated that ERE spacer sizes of 0-and 3-mer are preferred (Groups T and W; Table 2 and Fig. 5B), as has been observed previously (53). In addition, enhanced ER␣ interaction at an inverted repeat is consistent with ER␣ dimer binding, and our previous findings indicated that Pin1 enhances ER␣ dimerization (25).…”
Section: Pin1 Isomerase Function Increases Er␣ Binding Affinity To supporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The SNAP data indicated that ERE spacer sizes of 0-and 3-mer are preferred (Groups T and W; Table 2 and Fig. 5B), as has been observed previously (53). In addition, enhanced ER␣ interaction at an inverted repeat is consistent with ER␣ dimer binding, and our previous findings indicated that Pin1 enhances ER␣ dimerization (25).…”
Section: Pin1 Isomerase Function Increases Er␣ Binding Affinity To supporting
confidence: 84%
“…These findings are observed in the SSLs, in which the sequences in the central ring (perfect match to the SSL consensus; shown by arrows) of the ER␣ ϩ Pin1 landscape are of significantly higher intensity than the central ring of the ER␣-alone landscape. Comparison of the SSLs showed several Pin1-induced high intensity peaks in the outer rings, and these sequences correspond to AGGTCA direct repeats of 0 and 3 spacers, which are known ER␣ targets (53). A ridge of higher intensity peaks radiating outward in the ER␣ ϩ Pin1 landscape also contains sequences in which the motif degrades starting at the 3Ј-end.…”
Section: Regulation Of Er␣ Dna Binding Activity By Pin1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each nuclear receptor, the consensus response element has historically been defined by binding sequences usually in the form of two palindromic/inverted hexameric half sites separated by a three-nucleotide spacer, adjacent to genes transcriptionally responsive by that receptor. However, for the AR and ERa, there is evidence for interactions with sequences that do not conform to the defined consensus response element (43,44). The AR is also unique in that it can bind to response element half-sites arranged as both inverted and direct repeats (45,46).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). An additional motif located, at -220, is composed of two half EREs separated by a single nucleotide spacer and almost certainly does not correspond to a structural and functional ERE [5][6]32]. Compared to the consensus sequence, the two putative identified…”
Section: Putative Imperfect Ere Located In Te Sequences Within Intergmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As pERE 2 appears as the main We next assessed the enhancer activity of this genomic region in yeast, with pY60ER and YRPE2-derivative plasmids. This convenient cellular system has long proved instrumental for the characterization of the rtER, the promoter of several E S -inducible genes and to screen the estrogenic-potency of xenobiotics [6,8,31,39]. This analysis restricted the position of the E2-dependent enhancer to a short region located between positions -130 and -190 from the TSS.…”
Section: Er Specifically Binds To the Pere2mentioning
confidence: 99%