2012
DOI: 10.1155/2012/121424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Plasma Membrane Potential and the Organization of the Actin Cytoskeleton of Epithelial Cells

Abstract: The establishment and maintenance of the polarized epithelial phenotype require a characteristic organization of the cytoskeletal components. There are many cellular effectors involved in the regulation of the cytoskeleton of epithelial cells. Recently, modifications in the plasma membrane potential (PMP) have been suggested to participate in the modulation of the cytoskeletal organization of epithelia. Here, we review evidence showing that changes in the PMP of diverse epithelial cells promote characteristic … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 177 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This plasma membrane depolarization was then shown to mediate senescence, as (i) its reversal by knocking down SCN9A allows to bypass OIS and (ii) forced plasma membrane depolarization induces a premature senescence. It appears that plasma membrane depolarization and SCN9A have so far never been linked to cellular senescence, although it is well established that they impact cell behavior (Chifflet & Hernandez, 2012; Dib‐Hajj, Yang Black & Waxman, 2013; Franco, Bortner & Cidlowski, 2006; Suzuki‐Karasaki, Suzuki‐Karasaki, Uchida & Ochiai, 2014; Willenborg et al., 2011). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This plasma membrane depolarization was then shown to mediate senescence, as (i) its reversal by knocking down SCN9A allows to bypass OIS and (ii) forced plasma membrane depolarization induces a premature senescence. It appears that plasma membrane depolarization and SCN9A have so far never been linked to cellular senescence, although it is well established that they impact cell behavior (Chifflet & Hernandez, 2012; Dib‐Hajj, Yang Black & Waxman, 2013; Franco, Bortner & Cidlowski, 2006; Suzuki‐Karasaki, Suzuki‐Karasaki, Uchida & Ochiai, 2014; Willenborg et al., 2011). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, membrane hyperpolarization might be the crucial factor since it occurs both in wild-type plants in low-K and in akt1 mutants in sufficient K (Spalding et al, 1999). Membrane hyperpolarization has been shown to evoke changes in the actin cytoskeleton in mammals (Nin et al, 2009;Chifflet and Hernández, 2012), thus providing a potential link to cellular growth and shape. In summary, MR angle is determined by a membrane-delimited regulatory module that involves AKT1 and NRT2.1 but not CIPK23 or NRT1.1.…”
Section: Opposite Action Of Akt1 and Nrt21 Determines The Mr Anglementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is not known if this occurs in SCs. However, dynamic variability of V m , in association with "field potentials" has been found within the architecture of neurones (axons and dendritic spines) and polarized epithelia (Bloodgood, Giessel, & Sabatini, 2009;Chifflet & Hernandez, 2012). Such spatial differences of V m can occur in electrically isolated patches of membrane in a given single cell.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%