2008
DOI: 10.1134/s0031030108060063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The placoderm Plourdosteus livonicus (Eastman) in the early Frasnian of the Central Devonian Field and the trophic structure of the Mikhailovskii Fish Assemblage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Escuminaspis and Levesquaspis were detritivores most likely consuming both bottom detritus and particles and organisms suspended in the water column (Moloshnikov 2008). Bothriolepis canadensis, Plourdosteus canadensis and the dipnoans are considered benthivores (Moloshnikov 2008). The four species of acanthodians were most likely planktivores (Trewin 1986) and contributed as forage fish in the fish palaeocommunity.…”
Section: Taxonomic and Palaeoecological Diversity (Invertebrates And mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Escuminaspis and Levesquaspis were detritivores most likely consuming both bottom detritus and particles and organisms suspended in the water column (Moloshnikov 2008). Bothriolepis canadensis, Plourdosteus canadensis and the dipnoans are considered benthivores (Moloshnikov 2008). The four species of acanthodians were most likely planktivores (Trewin 1986) and contributed as forage fish in the fish palaeocommunity.…”
Section: Taxonomic and Palaeoecological Diversity (Invertebrates And mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Based on their relatively flattened morphology, three species (Escuminaspis laticeps, Levesquaspis patteni, Bothriolepis canadensis) are considered as bottom dwellers. Escuminaspis and Levesquaspis were detritivores most likely consuming both bottom detritus and particles and organisms suspended in the water column (Moloshnikov 2008). Bothriolepis canadensis, Plourdosteus canadensis and the dipnoans are considered benthivores (Moloshnikov 2008).…”
Section: Taxonomic and Palaeoecological Diversity (Invertebrates And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is corroborated by the similarities of L. ziregensis with Mcnamaraspis kaprios , a plourdosteid with a similarly broad sub-rectangular outline of the PSG with two ventral margins preceding the lateral and posterior processes and lacking a mesial tooth like L. ziregensis . However, the phylogenetic position of plourdosteids is uncertain and placed with both coccosteomorphs (Ørvig 1980 ; Moloshnikov 2008 ) and pachyosteomorphs (Vézina 1990 ). A feasible explanation for this long-lasting debate is the potential paraphyly of the group (Carr and Hlavin 1995 ; Carr 2004 ; Anderson 2008 ).…”
Section: Systematic Paleontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Escuminaspis and Levesquaspis were detritivores, most likely consuming both bottom detritus and particles and organisms suspended in the water column, as suggested for Devonian osteostracans from Russia (Moloshnikov 2008). Bothriolepis, Plourdosteus and the dipnoans are considered benthivores (Moloshnikov 2008). The four Miguasha acanthodian species were likely planktivores, as suggested for anatomically similar acanthodians from Scotland (Trewin 1986).…”
Section: Evolutionary Significance Of the Miguasha Biotamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relatively flattened morphology and dorsal eye position of the osteostracan Escuminaspis and Levesquaspis, and the placoderm Bothriolepis, imply that they were also bottom dwellers. Escuminaspis and Levesquaspis were detritivores, most likely consuming both bottom detritus and particles and organisms suspended in the water column, as suggested for Devonian osteostracans from Russia (Moloshnikov 2008). Bothriolepis, Plourdosteus and the dipnoans are considered benthivores (Moloshnikov 2008).…”
Section: Evolutionary Significance Of the Miguasha Biotamentioning
confidence: 99%