The Handbook of Phonological Theory 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9781444343069.ch13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Place of Variation in Phonological Theory

Abstract: The publisher of this book does not permit the archiving in RUcore of this or any other version of the chapter. See the full description for a link to the book.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
105
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
7
105
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Coetzee & Pater (2011), phonological variation is "a situation in which a single morpheme can be realized in more than one phonetic form in a single environment". American English t/d-deletion (Labov, 1989;Guy, 1994;Coetzee, 2004), forms of reduplication in Ilokano (Hayes & Abad, 1989;Boersma & Hayes, 2001;Coetzee, 2006), and Japanese geminate devoicing (Coetzee & Kawahara, 2012) are all well-known examples of phonological variation.…”
Section: Background and Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…According to Coetzee & Pater (2011), phonological variation is "a situation in which a single morpheme can be realized in more than one phonetic form in a single environment". American English t/d-deletion (Labov, 1989;Guy, 1994;Coetzee, 2004), forms of reduplication in Ilokano (Hayes & Abad, 1989;Boersma & Hayes, 2001;Coetzee, 2006), and Japanese geminate devoicing (Coetzee & Kawahara, 2012) are all well-known examples of phonological variation.…”
Section: Background and Purposementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In generative phonology, underlying lexical items may be changed by phonological derivation, which begins with the application of lexical phonological rules, followed by the application of post-lexical phonological rules (Kiparsky, 1982(Kiparsky, , 1985(Kiparsky, , 1993Anttila, 1997). Coetzee & Pater (2011) used the more neutral terms of early and late phonology to avoid characterizing the distinction between different levels of the phonological grammar in a too theory-specific way. In general, the characteristics of early phonology are that: (a) it is sensitive to morphology due to its direct interaction with the lexicon, (b) there may be lexical exceptions, 2 (c) there are only categorical changes at this level, (d) input to this level is single words, and (e) there is no contact with phonetics.…”
Section: Variation In Phonologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An approach that is implementationally much closer to the one here is that of indexed constraints, as developed in Pater (2006Pater ( , 2008; Coetzee and Pater (2008);and Becker (2009). When, in the course of learning, a ranking contradiction occurs, a constraint is chosen to be "cloned", or split into two differently-ranked versions that apply to different sets of words.…”
Section: Other Models Of Lexical Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is probably an idealization. For example, see Coetzee and Pater's (2008) data on English t/d deletion, which shows word-specific effects even beyond those of usage frequency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%