2000
DOI: 10.1093/alh/12.3.467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Place of Ritual in Our Time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shils andYoung (1953), Chaney (1983), Dayan and Katz (1992), and Rothenbuhler (1998 To argue that ritual expresses and reproduces forms of social integration through the collective imagining of community by invoking the power of "an overarching parahuman authority, such as a deity, the state, or an institution such as a university" (Santino 2005, 364) troubles scholars like Couldry (2005), who argue that "it is precisely this association of ritual with social integration and with the standard integrationist reading of Durkheim that we need to challenge" ( 61). Yet, although this dissertation draws on Couldry himself in order to problematize traditional methods of analyzing civic ritual, it does not entirely reject the established neo-Durkheimian approach, which views ritual as a regularly occurring, symbolic, social, and integrative "act of commemoration" (Mizruchi 2000). The dissertation follows Rothenbuhler (1998), Couldry's sometime collaborator, in arguing that "the ideas celebrated by inaugurations and other state and political events... are a model of a better world, and their periodic celebration draws attention to the possibilities" of Good politics ( 92), while at the same time conducting analysis in accordance with the assumption that civic ceremonies "can have social functions only via their communicative capacities" (104).…”
Section: Citizenization: Of Civic Ritual Of Legislative Politicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shils andYoung (1953), Chaney (1983), Dayan and Katz (1992), and Rothenbuhler (1998 To argue that ritual expresses and reproduces forms of social integration through the collective imagining of community by invoking the power of "an overarching parahuman authority, such as a deity, the state, or an institution such as a university" (Santino 2005, 364) troubles scholars like Couldry (2005), who argue that "it is precisely this association of ritual with social integration and with the standard integrationist reading of Durkheim that we need to challenge" ( 61). Yet, although this dissertation draws on Couldry himself in order to problematize traditional methods of analyzing civic ritual, it does not entirely reject the established neo-Durkheimian approach, which views ritual as a regularly occurring, symbolic, social, and integrative "act of commemoration" (Mizruchi 2000). The dissertation follows Rothenbuhler (1998), Couldry's sometime collaborator, in arguing that "the ideas celebrated by inaugurations and other state and political events... are a model of a better world, and their periodic celebration draws attention to the possibilities" of Good politics ( 92), while at the same time conducting analysis in accordance with the assumption that civic ceremonies "can have social functions only via their communicative capacities" (104).…”
Section: Citizenization: Of Civic Ritual Of Legislative Politicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shils andYoung (1953), Chaney (1983), Dayan and Katz (1992), and Rothenbuhler (1998 To argue that ritual expresses and reproduces forms of social integration through the collective imagining of community by invoking the power of "an overarching parahuman authority, such as a deity, the state, or an institution such as a university" (Santino 2005, 364) troubles scholars like Couldry (2005), who argue that "it is precisely this association of ritual with social integration and with the standard integrationist reading of Durkheim that we need to challenge" ( 61). Yet, although this dissertation draws on Couldry himself in order to problematize traditional methods of analyzing civic ritual, it does not entirely reject the established neo-Durkheimian approach, which views ritual as a regularly occurring, symbolic, social, and integrative "act of commemoration" (Mizruchi 2000). The dissertation follows Rothenbuhler (1998), Couldry's sometime collaborator, in arguing that "the ideas celebrated by inaugurations and other state and political events... are a model of a better world, and their periodic celebration draws attention to the possibilities" of Good politics ( 92), while at the same time conducting analysis in accordance with the assumption that civic ceremonies "can have social functions only via their communicative capacities" (104).…”
Section: Citizenization: Of Civic Ritual Of Legislative Politicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a similar strategy to pursuing comparative-religions work by starting from perspectives that take as normative religions other than Christianity (McClymond 2108), how might our theoretical categories-such as theology, ritual, sacrifice, mysticism, secularism-change if women and their experiences were centered, rather than marginalized (e.g., Mahmood 2005;Walton 2011;Frederick 2003;Chireau 2003;Bell 1997, pp. 237-42;Sered (1992Sered ( , 1994Duncan 2008;Fedele 2103;Bynum 1987;Jay 1992;Mizruchi 2001;Dubisch 1995Dubisch , 2009Fedele and Knibbe 2013;Scott 2011;Zwissler (2011Zwissler ( , 2018…”
Section: Conclusion: In Theory Merry Meet and Merry Part And Merry mentioning
confidence: 99%